Exploratory trials, confirmatory observations: A new reasoning model in the era of patient-centered medicine

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The prevailing view in therapeutic clinical research today is that observational studies are useful for generating new hypotheses and that controlled experiments (i.e., randomized clinical trials, RCTs) are the most appropriate metho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sacristán José A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-04-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/57
id doaj-6a7c580a3b684a51a1b4178c1b61b232
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6a7c580a3b684a51a1b4178c1b61b2322020-11-25T01:27:06ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882011-04-011115710.1186/1471-2288-11-57Exploratory trials, confirmatory observations: A new reasoning model in the era of patient-centered medicineSacristán José A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The prevailing view in therapeutic clinical research today is that observational studies are useful for generating new hypotheses and that controlled experiments (i.e., randomized clinical trials, RCTs) are the most appropriate method for assessing and confirming the efficacy of interventions.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The current trend towards patient-centered medicine calls for alternative ways of reasoning, and in particular for a shift towards hypothetico-deductive logic, in which theory is adjusted in light of individual facts. A new model of this kind should change our approach to drug research and development, and regulation. The assessment of new therapeutic agents would be viewed as a continuous process, and regulatory approval would no longer be regarded as the final step in the testing of a hypothesis, but rather, as the hypothesis-generating step.</p> <p>The main role of RCTs in this patient-centered research paradigm would be to generate hypotheses, while observations would serve primarily to test their validity for different types of patients. Under hypothetico-deductive logic, RCTs are considered "exploratory" and observations, "confirmatory".</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>In this era of tailored therapeutics, the answers to therapeutic questions cannot come exclusively from methods that rely on data aggregation, the analysis of similarities, controlled experiments, and a search for the best outcome for the average patient; they must also come from methods based on data disaggregation, analysis of subgroups and individuals, an integration of research and clinical practice, systematic observations, and a search for the best outcome for the individual patient. We must look not only to evidence-based medicine, but also to medicine-based evidence, in seeking the knowledge that we need.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/57
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sacristán José A
spellingShingle Sacristán José A
Exploratory trials, confirmatory observations: A new reasoning model in the era of patient-centered medicine
BMC Medical Research Methodology
author_facet Sacristán José A
author_sort Sacristán José A
title Exploratory trials, confirmatory observations: A new reasoning model in the era of patient-centered medicine
title_short Exploratory trials, confirmatory observations: A new reasoning model in the era of patient-centered medicine
title_full Exploratory trials, confirmatory observations: A new reasoning model in the era of patient-centered medicine
title_fullStr Exploratory trials, confirmatory observations: A new reasoning model in the era of patient-centered medicine
title_full_unstemmed Exploratory trials, confirmatory observations: A new reasoning model in the era of patient-centered medicine
title_sort exploratory trials, confirmatory observations: a new reasoning model in the era of patient-centered medicine
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
issn 1471-2288
publishDate 2011-04-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The prevailing view in therapeutic clinical research today is that observational studies are useful for generating new hypotheses and that controlled experiments (i.e., randomized clinical trials, RCTs) are the most appropriate method for assessing and confirming the efficacy of interventions.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The current trend towards patient-centered medicine calls for alternative ways of reasoning, and in particular for a shift towards hypothetico-deductive logic, in which theory is adjusted in light of individual facts. A new model of this kind should change our approach to drug research and development, and regulation. The assessment of new therapeutic agents would be viewed as a continuous process, and regulatory approval would no longer be regarded as the final step in the testing of a hypothesis, but rather, as the hypothesis-generating step.</p> <p>The main role of RCTs in this patient-centered research paradigm would be to generate hypotheses, while observations would serve primarily to test their validity for different types of patients. Under hypothetico-deductive logic, RCTs are considered "exploratory" and observations, "confirmatory".</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>In this era of tailored therapeutics, the answers to therapeutic questions cannot come exclusively from methods that rely on data aggregation, the analysis of similarities, controlled experiments, and a search for the best outcome for the average patient; they must also come from methods based on data disaggregation, analysis of subgroups and individuals, an integration of research and clinical practice, systematic observations, and a search for the best outcome for the individual patient. We must look not only to evidence-based medicine, but also to medicine-based evidence, in seeking the knowledge that we need.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/57
work_keys_str_mv AT sacristanjosea exploratorytrialsconfirmatoryobservationsanewreasoningmodelintheeraofpatientcenteredmedicine
_version_ 1725107055708078080