5-a-day fruit and vegetable food product labels: reduced fruit and vegetable consumption following an exaggerated compared to a modest label

Abstract Background Food product labels based on the WHO 5-a-day fruit and vegetable (FV) message are becoming increasingly common, but these labels may impact negatively on complementary or subsequent FV consumption. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a ‘3 of your 5-a-day’ versus a ‘1 of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. M. Appleton, H. J. Pidgeon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-05-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-5528-0
id doaj-684c1c74c80741e6b9a0622444c8b300
record_format Article
spelling doaj-684c1c74c80741e6b9a0622444c8b3002020-11-24T22:06:51ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582018-05-011811810.1186/s12889-018-5528-05-a-day fruit and vegetable food product labels: reduced fruit and vegetable consumption following an exaggerated compared to a modest labelK. M. Appleton0H. J. Pidgeon1Research Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Psychology, Bournemouth UniversityResearch Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Psychology, Bournemouth UniversityAbstract Background Food product labels based on the WHO 5-a-day fruit and vegetable (FV) message are becoming increasingly common, but these labels may impact negatively on complementary or subsequent FV consumption. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a ‘3 of your 5-a-day’ versus a ‘1 of your 5-a-day’ smoothie product label on subsequent FV consumption. Methods Using an acute experimental design, 194 participants (90 males, 104 females) were randomised to consume a smoothie labelled as either ‘3 of your 5-a-day’ (N = 97) or ‘1 of your 5-a-day’ (N = 97) in full, following a usual breakfast. Subsequent FV consumption was measured for the rest of the day using 24-h recall. Usual FV consumption was also assessed via 24-h recall for the day before the study. Results Regression analyses revealed a significantly lower subsequent FV consumption following smoothies displaying the ‘3 of your 5-a-day’ label compared to the ‘1 of your 5-a-day’ label (Beta = − 0.15, p = 0.04). Secondary analyses revealed these effects to be driven mainly by changes to consumption in usual high FV consumers, in females and in vegetable as opposed to fruit consumption. Conclusions These findings demonstrate a role for label information in food intake, and the potential negative impacts of an exaggerated food product label on healthy food consumption and healthy dietary profiles.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-5528-0Fruit and vegetables5-a-dayLabelsIntake
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K. M. Appleton
H. J. Pidgeon
spellingShingle K. M. Appleton
H. J. Pidgeon
5-a-day fruit and vegetable food product labels: reduced fruit and vegetable consumption following an exaggerated compared to a modest label
BMC Public Health
Fruit and vegetables
5-a-day
Labels
Intake
author_facet K. M. Appleton
H. J. Pidgeon
author_sort K. M. Appleton
title 5-a-day fruit and vegetable food product labels: reduced fruit and vegetable consumption following an exaggerated compared to a modest label
title_short 5-a-day fruit and vegetable food product labels: reduced fruit and vegetable consumption following an exaggerated compared to a modest label
title_full 5-a-day fruit and vegetable food product labels: reduced fruit and vegetable consumption following an exaggerated compared to a modest label
title_fullStr 5-a-day fruit and vegetable food product labels: reduced fruit and vegetable consumption following an exaggerated compared to a modest label
title_full_unstemmed 5-a-day fruit and vegetable food product labels: reduced fruit and vegetable consumption following an exaggerated compared to a modest label
title_sort 5-a-day fruit and vegetable food product labels: reduced fruit and vegetable consumption following an exaggerated compared to a modest label
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Abstract Background Food product labels based on the WHO 5-a-day fruit and vegetable (FV) message are becoming increasingly common, but these labels may impact negatively on complementary or subsequent FV consumption. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a ‘3 of your 5-a-day’ versus a ‘1 of your 5-a-day’ smoothie product label on subsequent FV consumption. Methods Using an acute experimental design, 194 participants (90 males, 104 females) were randomised to consume a smoothie labelled as either ‘3 of your 5-a-day’ (N = 97) or ‘1 of your 5-a-day’ (N = 97) in full, following a usual breakfast. Subsequent FV consumption was measured for the rest of the day using 24-h recall. Usual FV consumption was also assessed via 24-h recall for the day before the study. Results Regression analyses revealed a significantly lower subsequent FV consumption following smoothies displaying the ‘3 of your 5-a-day’ label compared to the ‘1 of your 5-a-day’ label (Beta = − 0.15, p = 0.04). Secondary analyses revealed these effects to be driven mainly by changes to consumption in usual high FV consumers, in females and in vegetable as opposed to fruit consumption. Conclusions These findings demonstrate a role for label information in food intake, and the potential negative impacts of an exaggerated food product label on healthy food consumption and healthy dietary profiles.
topic Fruit and vegetables
5-a-day
Labels
Intake
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-5528-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kmappleton 5adayfruitandvegetablefoodproductlabelsreducedfruitandvegetableconsumptionfollowinganexaggeratedcomparedtoamodestlabel
AT hjpidgeon 5adayfruitandvegetablefoodproductlabelsreducedfruitandvegetableconsumptionfollowinganexaggeratedcomparedtoamodestlabel
_version_ 1725821418196697088