LITTLE LEARNING; LESS GRAMMAR: OBSERVATIONS ON CURRICULUM FOR ENGLISH AS A FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE
<p><em>In this article it is argued that the theory underpinning the Department of Basic Education’s National Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statements (CAPS) on English as First Additional Language (Grades 10–12) might not be suitable for South African pupils. This is because it is b...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Afrikaans |
Published: |
Stellenbosch University
2012-09-01
|
Series: | Per Linguam : A Journal of Language Learning |
Online Access: | http://perlinguam.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/119 |
id |
doaj-677419837fff4636a51269d29ef55a13 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-677419837fff4636a51269d29ef55a132020-11-25T03:50:16ZafrStellenbosch UniversityPer Linguam : A Journal of Language Learning0259-23122224-00122012-09-0128110.5785/28-1-119LITTLE LEARNING; LESS GRAMMAR: OBSERVATIONS ON CURRICULUM FOR ENGLISH AS A FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGEDiana Ayliff<p><em>In this article it is argued that the theory underpinning the Department of Basic Education’s National Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statements (CAPS) on English as First Additional Language (Grades 10–12) might not be suitable for South African pupils. This is because it is biased towards a communicative model and, while this approach usually produces relatively fluent speakers of English, it also often produces pupils whose written competence is poor. The reasons for this are partly because of the lack of grammar teaching and the unsuitability of a text-based approach that encourages incidental attention to grammatical structures. It is further argued that a form-focused approach might be a more successful one to adopt within the South African context. </em></p>http://perlinguam.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/119 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Afrikaans |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Diana Ayliff |
spellingShingle |
Diana Ayliff LITTLE LEARNING; LESS GRAMMAR: OBSERVATIONS ON CURRICULUM FOR ENGLISH AS A FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE Per Linguam : A Journal of Language Learning |
author_facet |
Diana Ayliff |
author_sort |
Diana Ayliff |
title |
LITTLE LEARNING; LESS GRAMMAR: OBSERVATIONS ON CURRICULUM FOR ENGLISH AS A FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE |
title_short |
LITTLE LEARNING; LESS GRAMMAR: OBSERVATIONS ON CURRICULUM FOR ENGLISH AS A FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE |
title_full |
LITTLE LEARNING; LESS GRAMMAR: OBSERVATIONS ON CURRICULUM FOR ENGLISH AS A FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE |
title_fullStr |
LITTLE LEARNING; LESS GRAMMAR: OBSERVATIONS ON CURRICULUM FOR ENGLISH AS A FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE |
title_full_unstemmed |
LITTLE LEARNING; LESS GRAMMAR: OBSERVATIONS ON CURRICULUM FOR ENGLISH AS A FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE |
title_sort |
little learning; less grammar: observations on curriculum for english as a first additional language |
publisher |
Stellenbosch University |
series |
Per Linguam : A Journal of Language Learning |
issn |
0259-2312 2224-0012 |
publishDate |
2012-09-01 |
description |
<p><em>In this article it is argued that the theory underpinning the Department of Basic Education’s National Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statements (CAPS) on English as First Additional Language (Grades 10–12) might not be suitable for South African pupils. This is because it is biased towards a communicative model and, while this approach usually produces relatively fluent speakers of English, it also often produces pupils whose written competence is poor. The reasons for this are partly because of the lack of grammar teaching and the unsuitability of a text-based approach that encourages incidental attention to grammatical structures. It is further argued that a form-focused approach might be a more successful one to adopt within the South African context. </em></p> |
url |
http://perlinguam.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/119 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dianaayliff littlelearninglessgrammarobservationsoncurriculumforenglishasafirstadditionallanguage |
_version_ |
1724491356467888128 |