Affective state influences retrieval-induced forgetting for integrated knowledge.

BACKGROUND: Selectively testing parts of learned materials can impair later memory for nontested materials. Research has shown that such retrieval-induced forgetting occurs for low-integrated materials but may be prevented for high-integrated materials. However, previous research has neglected one f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christof Kuhbandner, Reinhard Pekrun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3575490?pdf=render
id doaj-662e10e86bc141368bcc172c4c55f486
record_format Article
spelling doaj-662e10e86bc141368bcc172c4c55f4862020-11-25T02:15:31ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0182e5661710.1371/journal.pone.0056617Affective state influences retrieval-induced forgetting for integrated knowledge.Christof KuhbandnerReinhard PekrunBACKGROUND: Selectively testing parts of learned materials can impair later memory for nontested materials. Research has shown that such retrieval-induced forgetting occurs for low-integrated materials but may be prevented for high-integrated materials. However, previous research has neglected one factor that is ubiquitous in real-life testing: affective state. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We investigated whether affect influences the resistance of integrated materials to retrieval-induced forgetting by inducing neutral, positive, or negative affect immediately before selectively testing previously learned textbook passages containing interrelated facts and concepts. As negative affect is known to promote a detail-oriented local processing style, we hypothesized that experiencing negative affect during testing may decrease the protective effects of integration and lead to reoccurrence of forgetting. By contrast, as positive affect is known to promote a relation-oriented global processing style, we hypothesized that experiencing positive affect may support effects of integration and prevent forgetting. Our findings are consistent with these predictions. No subsequent forgetting occurred when testing memories for integrated text materials in affectively neutral and positive states, whereas forgetting occurred when testing in negative states. A correlation analysis showed that forgetting decreased with higher positive affect, with participants experiencing high positive affect even showing facilitation instead of forgetting. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings indicate that affect can moderate the memory consequences of test taking and suggest that educators should use testing as a tool to improve memory with care.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3575490?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christof Kuhbandner
Reinhard Pekrun
spellingShingle Christof Kuhbandner
Reinhard Pekrun
Affective state influences retrieval-induced forgetting for integrated knowledge.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Christof Kuhbandner
Reinhard Pekrun
author_sort Christof Kuhbandner
title Affective state influences retrieval-induced forgetting for integrated knowledge.
title_short Affective state influences retrieval-induced forgetting for integrated knowledge.
title_full Affective state influences retrieval-induced forgetting for integrated knowledge.
title_fullStr Affective state influences retrieval-induced forgetting for integrated knowledge.
title_full_unstemmed Affective state influences retrieval-induced forgetting for integrated knowledge.
title_sort affective state influences retrieval-induced forgetting for integrated knowledge.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description BACKGROUND: Selectively testing parts of learned materials can impair later memory for nontested materials. Research has shown that such retrieval-induced forgetting occurs for low-integrated materials but may be prevented for high-integrated materials. However, previous research has neglected one factor that is ubiquitous in real-life testing: affective state. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We investigated whether affect influences the resistance of integrated materials to retrieval-induced forgetting by inducing neutral, positive, or negative affect immediately before selectively testing previously learned textbook passages containing interrelated facts and concepts. As negative affect is known to promote a detail-oriented local processing style, we hypothesized that experiencing negative affect during testing may decrease the protective effects of integration and lead to reoccurrence of forgetting. By contrast, as positive affect is known to promote a relation-oriented global processing style, we hypothesized that experiencing positive affect may support effects of integration and prevent forgetting. Our findings are consistent with these predictions. No subsequent forgetting occurred when testing memories for integrated text materials in affectively neutral and positive states, whereas forgetting occurred when testing in negative states. A correlation analysis showed that forgetting decreased with higher positive affect, with participants experiencing high positive affect even showing facilitation instead of forgetting. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings indicate that affect can moderate the memory consequences of test taking and suggest that educators should use testing as a tool to improve memory with care.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3575490?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT christofkuhbandner affectivestateinfluencesretrievalinducedforgettingforintegratedknowledge
AT reinhardpekrun affectivestateinfluencesretrievalinducedforgettingforintegratedknowledge
_version_ 1724895682854125568