Ham quality and its relationship to carcass quality II. Spesific weight and dissection analysis of the ham

Ham quality and its relationship to carcass quality were investigated in Landrace and Yorkshire pigs at the Puistola (n = 97) and Pohjanmaa (n = 103) litter testing stations by means of specific weight of the ham and dissection analysis of the ham and the most valuable part of the carcass. The mater...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Unto Uusisalmi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 1971-09-01
Series:Agricultural and Food Science
Online Access:https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/71792
id doaj-64dcd6b2d5d94e608e2f37ae7f01f630
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64dcd6b2d5d94e608e2f37ae7f01f6302020-11-24T23:14:16ZengScientific Agricultural Society of FinlandAgricultural and Food Science1459-60671795-18951971-09-0143310.23986/afsci.71792Ham quality and its relationship to carcass quality II. Spesific weight and dissection analysis of the hamUnto Uusisalmi0Department of Animal Breeding, University of HelsinkiHam quality and its relationship to carcass quality were investigated in Landrace and Yorkshire pigs at the Puistola (n = 97) and Pohjanmaa (n = 103) litter testing stations by means of specific weight of the ham and dissection analysis of the ham and the most valuable part of the carcass. The material was processed by means of factor analysis. The greatest loading in the first factor was acquired by the fat-% of the ham (0.93), the second greatest by the meat-% of the ham (—0.90), the third greatest by the skin + fat part of the ham (0.89), and the fourth by the percentage of the skin + fat component of the most valuable part of the carcass (0.82). The skin + fat part of the ham correlated very significantly with the skin + fat component of the most valuable part of the carcass (Puistola r = 0.76, Pohjanmaa r = 0.74), and meat + bone part of the ham with the meat + bone component of the most valuable part of the carcass (Puistola r = 0.83, Pohjanmaa r = 0.81). In the Pohjanmaa material (n = 99) the phenotypical and genotypical correlations of the ham, back and their components with the carcass and its equivalent components were found to be relatively uniform. The only exception was the correlation of the meat + bone of the ham with the meat + bone of the most valuable part of the carcass (rphen. = 0.83, rgen. = 0.48). No significant phenotypical or genotypical correlation was found between the skin + fat of the ham and meat + bone of the ham.https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/71792
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Unto Uusisalmi
spellingShingle Unto Uusisalmi
Ham quality and its relationship to carcass quality II. Spesific weight and dissection analysis of the ham
Agricultural and Food Science
author_facet Unto Uusisalmi
author_sort Unto Uusisalmi
title Ham quality and its relationship to carcass quality II. Spesific weight and dissection analysis of the ham
title_short Ham quality and its relationship to carcass quality II. Spesific weight and dissection analysis of the ham
title_full Ham quality and its relationship to carcass quality II. Spesific weight and dissection analysis of the ham
title_fullStr Ham quality and its relationship to carcass quality II. Spesific weight and dissection analysis of the ham
title_full_unstemmed Ham quality and its relationship to carcass quality II. Spesific weight and dissection analysis of the ham
title_sort ham quality and its relationship to carcass quality ii. spesific weight and dissection analysis of the ham
publisher Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland
series Agricultural and Food Science
issn 1459-6067
1795-1895
publishDate 1971-09-01
description Ham quality and its relationship to carcass quality were investigated in Landrace and Yorkshire pigs at the Puistola (n = 97) and Pohjanmaa (n = 103) litter testing stations by means of specific weight of the ham and dissection analysis of the ham and the most valuable part of the carcass. The material was processed by means of factor analysis. The greatest loading in the first factor was acquired by the fat-% of the ham (0.93), the second greatest by the meat-% of the ham (—0.90), the third greatest by the skin + fat part of the ham (0.89), and the fourth by the percentage of the skin + fat component of the most valuable part of the carcass (0.82). The skin + fat part of the ham correlated very significantly with the skin + fat component of the most valuable part of the carcass (Puistola r = 0.76, Pohjanmaa r = 0.74), and meat + bone part of the ham with the meat + bone component of the most valuable part of the carcass (Puistola r = 0.83, Pohjanmaa r = 0.81). In the Pohjanmaa material (n = 99) the phenotypical and genotypical correlations of the ham, back and their components with the carcass and its equivalent components were found to be relatively uniform. The only exception was the correlation of the meat + bone of the ham with the meat + bone of the most valuable part of the carcass (rphen. = 0.83, rgen. = 0.48). No significant phenotypical or genotypical correlation was found between the skin + fat of the ham and meat + bone of the ham.
url https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/71792
work_keys_str_mv AT untouusisalmi hamqualityanditsrelationshiptocarcassqualityiispesificweightanddissectionanalysisoftheham
_version_ 1725595262543462400