Take-Home Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review

This work describes a systematic review of the research on take-home exams in tertiary education. It was found that there is some disagreement in the community about the virtues of take-home exams but also a lot of agreement. It is concluded that take-home exams may be the preferred choice of assess...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lars Bengtsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-11-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/9/4/267
id doaj-63b513747ab047f4a53e3e86c2e122a8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-63b513747ab047f4a53e3e86c2e122a82020-11-25T00:55:40ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022019-11-019426710.3390/educsci9040267educsci9040267Take-Home Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic ReviewLars Bengtsson0Physics Department, University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, SwedenThis work describes a systematic review of the research on take-home exams in tertiary education. It was found that there is some disagreement in the community about the virtues of take-home exams but also a lot of agreement. It is concluded that take-home exams may be the preferred choice of assessment method on the higher taxonomy levels because they promote higher-order thinking skills and allow time for reflection. They are also more consonant with constructive alignment theories and turn the assessment into a learning activity. Due to the obvious risk of unethical student behavior, take-home exams are not recommended on the lowest taxonomy level. It is concluded that there is still a lot of research missing concerning take-home exams in higher education and some of this research may be urgent due to the emergence of massive online open courses (MOOCs) and online universities where non-proctored exams prevail.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/9/4/267take-home examin-class examhigher-order cognitive skillsunethical student behavior
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lars Bengtsson
spellingShingle Lars Bengtsson
Take-Home Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
Education Sciences
take-home exam
in-class exam
higher-order cognitive skills
unethical student behavior
author_facet Lars Bengtsson
author_sort Lars Bengtsson
title Take-Home Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
title_short Take-Home Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
title_full Take-Home Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Take-Home Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Take-Home Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
title_sort take-home exams in higher education: a systematic review
publisher MDPI AG
series Education Sciences
issn 2227-7102
publishDate 2019-11-01
description This work describes a systematic review of the research on take-home exams in tertiary education. It was found that there is some disagreement in the community about the virtues of take-home exams but also a lot of agreement. It is concluded that take-home exams may be the preferred choice of assessment method on the higher taxonomy levels because they promote higher-order thinking skills and allow time for reflection. They are also more consonant with constructive alignment theories and turn the assessment into a learning activity. Due to the obvious risk of unethical student behavior, take-home exams are not recommended on the lowest taxonomy level. It is concluded that there is still a lot of research missing concerning take-home exams in higher education and some of this research may be urgent due to the emergence of massive online open courses (MOOCs) and online universities where non-proctored exams prevail.
topic take-home exam
in-class exam
higher-order cognitive skills
unethical student behavior
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/9/4/267
work_keys_str_mv AT larsbengtsson takehomeexamsinhighereducationasystematicreview
_version_ 1725229928533721088