Evaluating the Nutritional Content of Children’s Breakfast Cereals in Australia

Breakfast is an important contributor to the daily dietary intake of children. This study investigated the nutritional composition of ready to eat (RTE) children’s breakfast cereals, which display fictional cartoon characters and themes, compared to other cereals available in Australia. Nu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Terence Tong, Anna Rangan, Luke Gemming
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-06-01
Series:Children
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/5/7/84
id doaj-62ec20436a824701900288709787b865
record_format Article
spelling doaj-62ec20436a824701900288709787b8652021-04-02T09:47:13ZengMDPI AGChildren2227-90672018-06-01578410.3390/children5070084children5070084Evaluating the Nutritional Content of Children’s Breakfast Cereals in AustraliaTerence Tong0Anna Rangan1Luke Gemming2Nutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, AustraliaNutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, AustraliaNutrition and Dietetics Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, AustraliaBreakfast is an important contributor to the daily dietary intake of children. This study investigated the nutritional composition of ready to eat (RTE) children’s breakfast cereals, which display fictional cartoon characters and themes, compared to other cereals available in Australia. Nutrient content claims on packaging were also examined. Data were collected from RTE breakfast cereal packages (N = 347) from four major supermarkets in Sydney. Cereals were classified based on product type and promotional information displayed. Overall, 46% of children’s cereals were classified as “less healthy” as per nutrient profiling score criteria. Children’s cereals had a similar energy and sodium content per 100 g compared to other cereals but contained significantly higher levels of total sugar and lower levels of protein and dietary fibre compared to other varieties. Children’s cereals with nutrient content claims had improved (lower) nutrient profiling scores than those that did not (2 vs. 13, p = 0.021), but total sugar per 100 g was similar: 25 g (interquartile range (IQR) 14 g) vs. 32 g (IQR 19 g). In conclusion, RTE children’s breakfast cereals were found to be less healthy compared to other cereals on the market and the use of nutrient content claims on children’s cereals may mislead consumers regarding their overall nutrient profile.http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/5/7/84breakfast cerealschildrenmarketingnutritional content
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Terence Tong
Anna Rangan
Luke Gemming
spellingShingle Terence Tong
Anna Rangan
Luke Gemming
Evaluating the Nutritional Content of Children’s Breakfast Cereals in Australia
Children
breakfast cereals
children
marketing
nutritional content
author_facet Terence Tong
Anna Rangan
Luke Gemming
author_sort Terence Tong
title Evaluating the Nutritional Content of Children’s Breakfast Cereals in Australia
title_short Evaluating the Nutritional Content of Children’s Breakfast Cereals in Australia
title_full Evaluating the Nutritional Content of Children’s Breakfast Cereals in Australia
title_fullStr Evaluating the Nutritional Content of Children’s Breakfast Cereals in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Nutritional Content of Children’s Breakfast Cereals in Australia
title_sort evaluating the nutritional content of children’s breakfast cereals in australia
publisher MDPI AG
series Children
issn 2227-9067
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Breakfast is an important contributor to the daily dietary intake of children. This study investigated the nutritional composition of ready to eat (RTE) children’s breakfast cereals, which display fictional cartoon characters and themes, compared to other cereals available in Australia. Nutrient content claims on packaging were also examined. Data were collected from RTE breakfast cereal packages (N = 347) from four major supermarkets in Sydney. Cereals were classified based on product type and promotional information displayed. Overall, 46% of children’s cereals were classified as “less healthy” as per nutrient profiling score criteria. Children’s cereals had a similar energy and sodium content per 100 g compared to other cereals but contained significantly higher levels of total sugar and lower levels of protein and dietary fibre compared to other varieties. Children’s cereals with nutrient content claims had improved (lower) nutrient profiling scores than those that did not (2 vs. 13, p = 0.021), but total sugar per 100 g was similar: 25 g (interquartile range (IQR) 14 g) vs. 32 g (IQR 19 g). In conclusion, RTE children’s breakfast cereals were found to be less healthy compared to other cereals on the market and the use of nutrient content claims on children’s cereals may mislead consumers regarding their overall nutrient profile.
topic breakfast cereals
children
marketing
nutritional content
url http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/5/7/84
work_keys_str_mv AT terencetong evaluatingthenutritionalcontentofchildrensbreakfastcerealsinaustralia
AT annarangan evaluatingthenutritionalcontentofchildrensbreakfastcerealsinaustralia
AT lukegemming evaluatingthenutritionalcontentofchildrensbreakfastcerealsinaustralia
_version_ 1724168656779214848