The sights and insights of examiners in objective structured clinical examinations
Purpose The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is considered to be one of the most robust methods of clinical assessment. One of its strengths lies in its ability to minimise the effects of examiner bias due to the standardisation of items and tasks for each candidate. However, OSCE ex...
Main Authors: | Lauren Chong, Silas Taylor, Matthew Haywood, Barbara-Ann Adelstein, Boaz Shulruf |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korea Health Insurance Licensing Examination Institute
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jeehp.org/upload/jeehp-14-34.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Examiner seniority and experience are associated with bias when scoring communication, but not examination, skills in objective structured clinical examinations in Australia
by: Lauren Chong, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Comparison of the effects of simulated patient clinical skill training and student roleplay on objective structured clinical examination performance among medical students in Australia
by: Silas Taylor, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Borderline grades in high stakes clinical examinations: resolving examiner uncertainty
by: Boaz Shulruf, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
The art and science of web-based literature search: the MEDLINE.
by: Sahu D, et al.
Published: (2000-04-01) -
Australian medical students have fewer opportunities to do physical examination of peers of the opposite gender
by: Silas Taylor, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01)