Fibrinolysis vs. primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock

Fibrinolysis vs. primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock

Abstract Aims There are limited contemporary data on the use of initial fibrinolysis in ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (STEMI‐CS). This study sought to compare the outcomes of STEMI‐CS receiving initial fibrinolysis vs. primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI)....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula, Dhiran Verghese, Malcolm R. Bell, Dennis H. Murphree, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Paul Elliott Miller, Shannon M. Dunlay, Abhiram Prasad, Gurpreet S. Sandhu, Rajiv Gulati, Mandeep Singh, Amir Lerman, Bernard J. Gersh, David R. Holmes Jr, Gregory W. Barsness
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-06-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction
Cardiogenic shock
Thrombolytics
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Outcomes research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13281

Internet

https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13281

Similar Items