Social Networking Sites, Personalization, and Trust in Government: Empirical Evidence for a Mediation Model

Political communication via social media might well counter the eroding political trust. In particular, social networking sites (SNS) enable direct flows of communication between citizens and the political elite, thereby reducing social and political gaps. Based on the concept of personalization of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Starke, Frank Marcinkowski, Florian Wintterlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-05-01
Series:Social Media + Society
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120913885
id doaj-5f0bea77f5fd41c68ca6a9f0ca92f7e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f0bea77f5fd41c68ca6a9f0ca92f7e12020-11-25T03:03:33ZengSAGE PublishingSocial Media + Society2056-30512020-05-01610.1177/2056305120913885Social Networking Sites, Personalization, and Trust in Government: Empirical Evidence for a Mediation ModelChristopher Starke0Frank Marcinkowski1Florian Wintterlin2Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, GermanyHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, GermanyUniversity of Münster, GermanyPolitical communication via social media might well counter the eroding political trust. In particular, social networking sites (SNS) enable direct flows of communication between citizens and the political elite, thereby reducing social and political gaps. Based on the concept of personalization of politics , we argue that interactions with politicians on SNS affect trust in government through a two-step process: First, interactions on SNS make citizens evaluate politicians’ characters more favorably. Second, these evaluations serve as cues for the citizens to develop or withdraw trust in government. We test indirect effects using four character traits as mediators: leadership, benevolence, responsiveness, and likeability. A representative online survey ( n  = 1117; in Germany) reveals that interactions with politicians on SNS increase the perceived likeability of candidates, and thus also trust in government. However, they do not affect the evaluation of the other traits: leadership, benevolence, and responsiveness.https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120913885
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christopher Starke
Frank Marcinkowski
Florian Wintterlin
spellingShingle Christopher Starke
Frank Marcinkowski
Florian Wintterlin
Social Networking Sites, Personalization, and Trust in Government: Empirical Evidence for a Mediation Model
Social Media + Society
author_facet Christopher Starke
Frank Marcinkowski
Florian Wintterlin
author_sort Christopher Starke
title Social Networking Sites, Personalization, and Trust in Government: Empirical Evidence for a Mediation Model
title_short Social Networking Sites, Personalization, and Trust in Government: Empirical Evidence for a Mediation Model
title_full Social Networking Sites, Personalization, and Trust in Government: Empirical Evidence for a Mediation Model
title_fullStr Social Networking Sites, Personalization, and Trust in Government: Empirical Evidence for a Mediation Model
title_full_unstemmed Social Networking Sites, Personalization, and Trust in Government: Empirical Evidence for a Mediation Model
title_sort social networking sites, personalization, and trust in government: empirical evidence for a mediation model
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Social Media + Society
issn 2056-3051
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Political communication via social media might well counter the eroding political trust. In particular, social networking sites (SNS) enable direct flows of communication between citizens and the political elite, thereby reducing social and political gaps. Based on the concept of personalization of politics , we argue that interactions with politicians on SNS affect trust in government through a two-step process: First, interactions on SNS make citizens evaluate politicians’ characters more favorably. Second, these evaluations serve as cues for the citizens to develop or withdraw trust in government. We test indirect effects using four character traits as mediators: leadership, benevolence, responsiveness, and likeability. A representative online survey ( n  = 1117; in Germany) reveals that interactions with politicians on SNS increase the perceived likeability of candidates, and thus also trust in government. However, they do not affect the evaluation of the other traits: leadership, benevolence, and responsiveness.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120913885
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherstarke socialnetworkingsitespersonalizationandtrustingovernmentempiricalevidenceforamediationmodel
AT frankmarcinkowski socialnetworkingsitespersonalizationandtrustingovernmentempiricalevidenceforamediationmodel
AT florianwintterlin socialnetworkingsitespersonalizationandtrustingovernmentempiricalevidenceforamediationmodel
_version_ 1724685161266675712