Assessment of Passive vs. Active Strategies for a School Building Design

This paper presents a simulation study to reduce heating and cooling energy demand of a school building in Seoul Metropolitan Area, Korea. The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of passive vs. active approaches on energy savings in buildings using EnergyPlus simulation. By controlling ligh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ji Eun Kang, Ki Uhn Ahn, Cheol Soo Park, Thorsten Schuetze
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-11-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/11/15136
id doaj-5df1bfe7a4f54c8d9e785dc0c69ce567
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5df1bfe7a4f54c8d9e785dc0c69ce5672020-11-25T00:00:40ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502015-11-01711151361515110.3390/su71115136su71115136Assessment of Passive vs. Active Strategies for a School Building DesignJi Eun Kang0Ki Uhn Ahn1Cheol Soo Park2Thorsten Schuetze3Department of u-City Design and Engineering, SungKyunKwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16419, KoreaSchool of Civil and Architectural Engineering, SungKyunKwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16419, KoreaSchool of Civil and Architectural Engineering, SungKyunKwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16419, KoreaDepartment of Architecture, SungKyunKwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16419, KoreaThis paper presents a simulation study to reduce heating and cooling energy demand of a school building in Seoul Metropolitan Area, Korea. The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of passive vs. active approaches on energy savings in buildings using EnergyPlus simulation. By controlling lighting, the energy saving of the original school building design was found most significant, and increased by 32% when the design was improved. It is noteworthy that energy saving potential of each room varies significantly depending on the rooms’ thermal characteristics and orientation. Thus, the analysis of energy saving should be introduced at the individual space level, not at the whole building level. Additionally, the simulation studies should be involved for rational decision-making. Finally, it was concluded that priority should be given to passive building design strategies, such as building orientation, as well as control and utilization of solar radiation. These passive energy saving strategies are related to urban, architectural design, and engineering issues, and are more beneficial in terms of energy savings than active strategies.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/11/15136energy efficiencypassiveactivebuilding design strategiesarchitectural engineeringenergy simulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ji Eun Kang
Ki Uhn Ahn
Cheol Soo Park
Thorsten Schuetze
spellingShingle Ji Eun Kang
Ki Uhn Ahn
Cheol Soo Park
Thorsten Schuetze
Assessment of Passive vs. Active Strategies for a School Building Design
Sustainability
energy efficiency
passive
active
building design strategies
architectural engineering
energy simulation
author_facet Ji Eun Kang
Ki Uhn Ahn
Cheol Soo Park
Thorsten Schuetze
author_sort Ji Eun Kang
title Assessment of Passive vs. Active Strategies for a School Building Design
title_short Assessment of Passive vs. Active Strategies for a School Building Design
title_full Assessment of Passive vs. Active Strategies for a School Building Design
title_fullStr Assessment of Passive vs. Active Strategies for a School Building Design
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Passive vs. Active Strategies for a School Building Design
title_sort assessment of passive vs. active strategies for a school building design
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2015-11-01
description This paper presents a simulation study to reduce heating and cooling energy demand of a school building in Seoul Metropolitan Area, Korea. The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of passive vs. active approaches on energy savings in buildings using EnergyPlus simulation. By controlling lighting, the energy saving of the original school building design was found most significant, and increased by 32% when the design was improved. It is noteworthy that energy saving potential of each room varies significantly depending on the rooms’ thermal characteristics and orientation. Thus, the analysis of energy saving should be introduced at the individual space level, not at the whole building level. Additionally, the simulation studies should be involved for rational decision-making. Finally, it was concluded that priority should be given to passive building design strategies, such as building orientation, as well as control and utilization of solar radiation. These passive energy saving strategies are related to urban, architectural design, and engineering issues, and are more beneficial in terms of energy savings than active strategies.
topic energy efficiency
passive
active
building design strategies
architectural engineering
energy simulation
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/11/15136
work_keys_str_mv AT jieunkang assessmentofpassivevsactivestrategiesforaschoolbuildingdesign
AT kiuhnahn assessmentofpassivevsactivestrategiesforaschoolbuildingdesign
AT cheolsoopark assessmentofpassivevsactivestrategiesforaschoolbuildingdesign
AT thorstenschuetze assessmentofpassivevsactivestrategiesforaschoolbuildingdesign
_version_ 1725444083660357632