Experimental assessment of static and dynamic algorithms for gene regulation inference from time series expression data

Accurate inference of causal gene regulatory networks from gene expression data is an open bioinformatics challenge. Gene interactions are dynamical processes and consequently we can expect that the effect of any regulation action occurs after a certain temporal lag. However such lag is unknown a pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miguel eLopes, Gianluca eBontempi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fgene.2013.00303/full
id doaj-596f98164bf54b2e887e72ddff6cbc14
record_format Article
spelling doaj-596f98164bf54b2e887e72ddff6cbc142020-11-25T00:55:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212013-12-01410.3389/fgene.2013.0030364278Experimental assessment of static and dynamic algorithms for gene regulation inference from time series expression dataMiguel eLopes0Miguel eLopes1Gianluca eBontempi2Gianluca eBontempi3ULBInteruniversity Institute of Bioinformatics Brussels (IB)^2ULBInteruniversity Institute of Bioinformatics Brussels (IB)^2Accurate inference of causal gene regulatory networks from gene expression data is an open bioinformatics challenge. Gene interactions are dynamical processes and consequently we can expect that the effect of any regulation action occurs after a certain temporal lag. However such lag is unknown a priori and temporal aspects require specific inference algorithms. In this paper we aim to assess the impact of taking into consideration temporal aspects on the final accuracy of the inference procedure. In particular we will compare the accuracy of static algorithms, where no dynamic aspect is considered, to that of fixed lag and adaptive lag algorithms in three inference tasks from microarray expression data. Experimental results show that network inference algorithms that take dynamics into account perform consistently better than static ones, once the considered lags are properly chosen. However, no individual algorithm stands out in all three inference tasks, and the challenging nature of network inference tasks is evidenced, as a large number of the assessed algorithms does not perform better than random.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fgene.2013.00303/fullgene network inferenceCausality inferencestatic modelstemporal modelsexperimental assessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Miguel eLopes
Miguel eLopes
Gianluca eBontempi
Gianluca eBontempi
spellingShingle Miguel eLopes
Miguel eLopes
Gianluca eBontempi
Gianluca eBontempi
Experimental assessment of static and dynamic algorithms for gene regulation inference from time series expression data
Frontiers in Genetics
gene network inference
Causality inference
static models
temporal models
experimental assessment
author_facet Miguel eLopes
Miguel eLopes
Gianluca eBontempi
Gianluca eBontempi
author_sort Miguel eLopes
title Experimental assessment of static and dynamic algorithms for gene regulation inference from time series expression data
title_short Experimental assessment of static and dynamic algorithms for gene regulation inference from time series expression data
title_full Experimental assessment of static and dynamic algorithms for gene regulation inference from time series expression data
title_fullStr Experimental assessment of static and dynamic algorithms for gene regulation inference from time series expression data
title_full_unstemmed Experimental assessment of static and dynamic algorithms for gene regulation inference from time series expression data
title_sort experimental assessment of static and dynamic algorithms for gene regulation inference from time series expression data
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Genetics
issn 1664-8021
publishDate 2013-12-01
description Accurate inference of causal gene regulatory networks from gene expression data is an open bioinformatics challenge. Gene interactions are dynamical processes and consequently we can expect that the effect of any regulation action occurs after a certain temporal lag. However such lag is unknown a priori and temporal aspects require specific inference algorithms. In this paper we aim to assess the impact of taking into consideration temporal aspects on the final accuracy of the inference procedure. In particular we will compare the accuracy of static algorithms, where no dynamic aspect is considered, to that of fixed lag and adaptive lag algorithms in three inference tasks from microarray expression data. Experimental results show that network inference algorithms that take dynamics into account perform consistently better than static ones, once the considered lags are properly chosen. However, no individual algorithm stands out in all three inference tasks, and the challenging nature of network inference tasks is evidenced, as a large number of the assessed algorithms does not perform better than random.
topic gene network inference
Causality inference
static models
temporal models
experimental assessment
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fgene.2013.00303/full
work_keys_str_mv AT miguelelopes experimentalassessmentofstaticanddynamicalgorithmsforgeneregulationinferencefromtimeseriesexpressiondata
AT miguelelopes experimentalassessmentofstaticanddynamicalgorithmsforgeneregulationinferencefromtimeseriesexpressiondata
AT gianlucaebontempi experimentalassessmentofstaticanddynamicalgorithmsforgeneregulationinferencefromtimeseriesexpressiondata
AT gianlucaebontempi experimentalassessmentofstaticanddynamicalgorithmsforgeneregulationinferencefromtimeseriesexpressiondata
_version_ 1725232406278963200