The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions
Cairns first suggested a mechanism for protecting the genomes of stem cells (SCs) from replicative errors some 40 years ago when he proposed the immortal strand hypothesis, which argued for the inheritance of a so-called immortal strand by an SC following asymmetric SC divisions. To date, the existe...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2012-06-01
|
Series: | Biomolecular Concepts |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/bmc-2011-0053 |
id |
doaj-54b570e471f7467fa872a9f7ccc12161 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-54b570e471f7467fa872a9f7ccc121612021-09-05T20:42:32ZengDe GruyterBiomolecular Concepts1868-50211868-503X2012-06-013320321110.1515/bmc-2011-0053The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinionsWakeman Jane A.0Hmadcha Abdelkrim1Soria Bernat2McFarlane Ramsay J.3North West Cancer Research Fund Institute, College Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UKCABIMER, Avda. Americo Vespucio s/n, Cartuja 93 Scientific and Technological Park, E-41092 Seville, SpainCABIMER, Avda. Americo Vespucio s/n, Cartuja 93 Scientific and Technological Park, E-41092 Seville, SpainNorth West Cancer Research Fund Institute, College Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UKCairns first suggested a mechanism for protecting the genomes of stem cells (SCs) from replicative errors some 40 years ago when he proposed the immortal strand hypothesis, which argued for the inheritance of a so-called immortal strand by an SC following asymmetric SC divisions. To date, the existence of immortal strands remains contentious with published evidence arguing in favour of and against the retention of an immortal strand by asymmetrically dividing SCs. The conflicting evidence is derived from a diverse array of studies on adult SC types and is predominantly based on following the fate of labelled DNA strands during asymmetric cell division events. Here, we review current data, highlighting limitations of such labelling techniques, and suggest how interpretation of such data may be improved in the future.https://doi.org/10.1515/bmc-2011-0053asymmetric/symmetric chromosome segregationimmortal strand hypothesismutation/cancer avoidancereplicative errorsstem cells |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wakeman Jane A. Hmadcha Abdelkrim Soria Bernat McFarlane Ramsay J. |
spellingShingle |
Wakeman Jane A. Hmadcha Abdelkrim Soria Bernat McFarlane Ramsay J. The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions Biomolecular Concepts asymmetric/symmetric chromosome segregation immortal strand hypothesis mutation/cancer avoidance replicative errors stem cells |
author_facet |
Wakeman Jane A. Hmadcha Abdelkrim Soria Bernat McFarlane Ramsay J. |
author_sort |
Wakeman Jane A. |
title |
The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions |
title_short |
The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions |
title_full |
The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions |
title_fullStr |
The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions |
title_full_unstemmed |
The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions |
title_sort |
immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Biomolecular Concepts |
issn |
1868-5021 1868-503X |
publishDate |
2012-06-01 |
description |
Cairns first suggested a mechanism for protecting the genomes of stem cells (SCs) from replicative errors some 40 years ago when he proposed the immortal strand hypothesis, which argued for the inheritance of a so-called immortal strand by an SC following asymmetric SC divisions. To date, the existence of immortal strands remains contentious with published evidence arguing in favour of and against the retention of an immortal strand by asymmetrically dividing SCs. The conflicting evidence is derived from a diverse array of studies on adult SC types and is predominantly based on following the fate of labelled DNA strands during asymmetric cell division events. Here, we review current data, highlighting limitations of such labelling techniques, and suggest how interpretation of such data may be improved in the future. |
topic |
asymmetric/symmetric chromosome segregation immortal strand hypothesis mutation/cancer avoidance replicative errors stem cells |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/bmc-2011-0053 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wakemanjanea theimmortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions AT hmadchaabdelkrim theimmortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions AT soriabernat theimmortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions AT mcfarlaneramsayj theimmortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions AT wakemanjanea immortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions AT hmadchaabdelkrim immortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions AT soriabernat immortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions AT mcfarlaneramsayj immortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions |
_version_ |
1717785524203159552 |