The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions

Cairns first suggested a mechanism for protecting the genomes of stem cells (SCs) from replicative errors some 40 years ago when he proposed the immortal strand hypothesis, which argued for the inheritance of a so-called immortal strand by an SC following asymmetric SC divisions. To date, the existe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wakeman Jane A., Hmadcha Abdelkrim, Soria Bernat, McFarlane Ramsay J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2012-06-01
Series:Biomolecular Concepts
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/bmc-2011-0053
id doaj-54b570e471f7467fa872a9f7ccc12161
record_format Article
spelling doaj-54b570e471f7467fa872a9f7ccc121612021-09-05T20:42:32ZengDe GruyterBiomolecular Concepts1868-50211868-503X2012-06-013320321110.1515/bmc-2011-0053The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinionsWakeman Jane A.0Hmadcha Abdelkrim1Soria Bernat2McFarlane Ramsay J.3North West Cancer Research Fund Institute, College Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UKCABIMER, Avda. Americo Vespucio s/n, Cartuja 93 Scientific and Technological Park, E-41092 Seville, SpainCABIMER, Avda. Americo Vespucio s/n, Cartuja 93 Scientific and Technological Park, E-41092 Seville, SpainNorth West Cancer Research Fund Institute, College Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UKCairns first suggested a mechanism for protecting the genomes of stem cells (SCs) from replicative errors some 40 years ago when he proposed the immortal strand hypothesis, which argued for the inheritance of a so-called immortal strand by an SC following asymmetric SC divisions. To date, the existence of immortal strands remains contentious with published evidence arguing in favour of and against the retention of an immortal strand by asymmetrically dividing SCs. The conflicting evidence is derived from a diverse array of studies on adult SC types and is predominantly based on following the fate of labelled DNA strands during asymmetric cell division events. Here, we review current data, highlighting limitations of such labelling techniques, and suggest how interpretation of such data may be improved in the future.https://doi.org/10.1515/bmc-2011-0053asymmetric/symmetric chromosome segregationimmortal strand hypothesismutation/cancer avoidancereplicative errorsstem cells
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wakeman Jane A.
Hmadcha Abdelkrim
Soria Bernat
McFarlane Ramsay J.
spellingShingle Wakeman Jane A.
Hmadcha Abdelkrim
Soria Bernat
McFarlane Ramsay J.
The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions
Biomolecular Concepts
asymmetric/symmetric chromosome segregation
immortal strand hypothesis
mutation/cancer avoidance
replicative errors
stem cells
author_facet Wakeman Jane A.
Hmadcha Abdelkrim
Soria Bernat
McFarlane Ramsay J.
author_sort Wakeman Jane A.
title The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions
title_short The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions
title_full The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions
title_fullStr The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions
title_full_unstemmed The immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions
title_sort immortal strand hypothesis: still non-randomly segregating opinions
publisher De Gruyter
series Biomolecular Concepts
issn 1868-5021
1868-503X
publishDate 2012-06-01
description Cairns first suggested a mechanism for protecting the genomes of stem cells (SCs) from replicative errors some 40 years ago when he proposed the immortal strand hypothesis, which argued for the inheritance of a so-called immortal strand by an SC following asymmetric SC divisions. To date, the existence of immortal strands remains contentious with published evidence arguing in favour of and against the retention of an immortal strand by asymmetrically dividing SCs. The conflicting evidence is derived from a diverse array of studies on adult SC types and is predominantly based on following the fate of labelled DNA strands during asymmetric cell division events. Here, we review current data, highlighting limitations of such labelling techniques, and suggest how interpretation of such data may be improved in the future.
topic asymmetric/symmetric chromosome segregation
immortal strand hypothesis
mutation/cancer avoidance
replicative errors
stem cells
url https://doi.org/10.1515/bmc-2011-0053
work_keys_str_mv AT wakemanjanea theimmortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions
AT hmadchaabdelkrim theimmortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions
AT soriabernat theimmortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions
AT mcfarlaneramsayj theimmortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions
AT wakemanjanea immortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions
AT hmadchaabdelkrim immortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions
AT soriabernat immortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions
AT mcfarlaneramsayj immortalstrandhypothesisstillnonrandomlysegregatingopinions
_version_ 1717785524203159552