Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study

Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study

Abstract Background Systematic reviews (SRs) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can provide the best evidence to inform decision-making, but their methodological and reporting quality varies. Tools exist to guide the critical appraisal of quality and risk of bias in SRs, but evaluations of their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Allison Gates, Michelle Gates, Gonçalo Duarte, Maria Cary, Monika Becker, Barbara Prediger, Ben Vandermeer, Ricardo M. Fernandes, Dawid Pieper, Lisa Hartling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-06-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Reliability
Validity
Systematic reviews
Risk of bias
Quality assessment
Overviews of reviews
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-018-0746-1

Internet

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-018-0746-1

Similar Items