Institutions, interests, ideas and actors: An analysis of Pronacampo based on a cognitive approach
The paper examines the construction of Programa Nacional de Educação do Campo [National Program of Rural Education] (Pronacampo) between 2011 and 2014. It analyzes the institutionalized ideas that originated Pronacampo, the actors and the interests involved, based on the cognitive approach of public...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Arizona State University
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Education Policy Analysis Archives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/3376 |
id |
doaj-4e87a7743e6d4f4f9f686caa9644dc77 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4e87a7743e6d4f4f9f686caa9644dc772020-11-25T03:30:20ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412018-07-0126010.14507/epaa.26.33761774Institutions, interests, ideas and actors: An analysis of Pronacampo based on a cognitive approachDamiana de Matos Costa França0Nalú Farenzena1Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulThe paper examines the construction of Programa Nacional de Educação do Campo [National Program of Rural Education] (Pronacampo) between 2011 and 2014. It analyzes the institutionalized ideas that originated Pronacampo, the actors and the interests involved, based on the cognitive approach of public policies analysis, with a greater approximation with Bruno Jobert and Ève Fouilleux’s perspective. It covers both the forum of ideas production, where the actors construct their ideas according to interests, institutions and power relations, and the forum of public policy communities, a space for organization and institutionalization of ideas. The study evidences that Pronacampo has differentiated references that reflect representations of distinct actors. Therefore, Pronacampo expresses a hybrid policy reference when aggregating opposite interests.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/3376políticas públicaseducação públicaeducação do campo |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Damiana de Matos Costa França Nalú Farenzena |
spellingShingle |
Damiana de Matos Costa França Nalú Farenzena Institutions, interests, ideas and actors: An analysis of Pronacampo based on a cognitive approach Education Policy Analysis Archives políticas públicas educação pública educação do campo |
author_facet |
Damiana de Matos Costa França Nalú Farenzena |
author_sort |
Damiana de Matos Costa França |
title |
Institutions, interests, ideas and actors: An analysis of Pronacampo based on a cognitive approach |
title_short |
Institutions, interests, ideas and actors: An analysis of Pronacampo based on a cognitive approach |
title_full |
Institutions, interests, ideas and actors: An analysis of Pronacampo based on a cognitive approach |
title_fullStr |
Institutions, interests, ideas and actors: An analysis of Pronacampo based on a cognitive approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Institutions, interests, ideas and actors: An analysis of Pronacampo based on a cognitive approach |
title_sort |
institutions, interests, ideas and actors: an analysis of pronacampo based on a cognitive approach |
publisher |
Arizona State University |
series |
Education Policy Analysis Archives |
issn |
1068-2341 |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
The paper examines the construction of Programa Nacional de Educação do Campo [National Program of Rural Education] (Pronacampo) between 2011 and 2014. It analyzes the institutionalized ideas that originated Pronacampo, the actors and the interests involved, based on the cognitive approach of public policies analysis, with a greater approximation with Bruno Jobert and Ève Fouilleux’s perspective. It covers both the forum of ideas production, where the actors construct their ideas according to interests, institutions and power relations, and the forum of public policy communities, a space for organization and institutionalization of ideas. The study evidences that Pronacampo has differentiated references that reflect representations of distinct actors. Therefore, Pronacampo expresses a hybrid policy reference when aggregating opposite interests. |
topic |
políticas públicas educação pública educação do campo |
url |
https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/3376 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT damianadematoscostafranca institutionsinterestsideasandactorsananalysisofpronacampobasedonacognitiveapproach AT nalufarenzena institutionsinterestsideasandactorsananalysisofpronacampobasedonacognitiveapproach |
_version_ |
1724576112201170944 |