Epigenomic annotation of noncoding mutations identifies mutated pathways in primary liver cancer.

Evidence that noncoding mutation can result in cancer driver events is mounting. However, it is more difficult to assign molecular biological consequences to noncoding mutations than to coding mutations, and a typical cancer genome contains many more noncoding mutations than protein-coding mutations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca F Lowdon, Ting Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5363827?pdf=render
id doaj-4c66ba49f7534f6d85db6a78fd0c9177
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c66ba49f7534f6d85db6a78fd0c91772020-11-25T02:23:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01123e017403210.1371/journal.pone.0174032Epigenomic annotation of noncoding mutations identifies mutated pathways in primary liver cancer.Rebecca F LowdonTing WangEvidence that noncoding mutation can result in cancer driver events is mounting. However, it is more difficult to assign molecular biological consequences to noncoding mutations than to coding mutations, and a typical cancer genome contains many more noncoding mutations than protein-coding mutations. Accordingly, parsing functional noncoding mutation signal from noise remains an important challenge. Here we use an empirical approach to identify putatively functional noncoding somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) from liver cancer genomes. Annotation of candidate variants by publicly available epigenome datasets finds that 40.5% of SNVs fall in regulatory elements. When assigned to specific regulatory elements, we find that the distribution of regulatory element mutation mirrors that of nonsynonymous coding mutation, where few regulatory elements are recurrently mutated in a patient population but many are singly mutated. We find potential gain-of-binding site events among candidate SNVs, suggesting a mechanism of action for these variants. When aggregating noncoding somatic mutation in promoters, we find that genes in the ERBB signaling and MAPK signaling pathways are significantly enriched for promoter mutations. Altogether, our results suggest that functional somatic SNVs in cancer are sporadic, but occasionally occur in regulatory elements and may affect phenotype by creating binding sites for transcriptional regulators. Accordingly, we propose that noncoding mutation should be formally accounted for when determining gene- and pathway-mutation burden in cancer.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5363827?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rebecca F Lowdon
Ting Wang
spellingShingle Rebecca F Lowdon
Ting Wang
Epigenomic annotation of noncoding mutations identifies mutated pathways in primary liver cancer.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Rebecca F Lowdon
Ting Wang
author_sort Rebecca F Lowdon
title Epigenomic annotation of noncoding mutations identifies mutated pathways in primary liver cancer.
title_short Epigenomic annotation of noncoding mutations identifies mutated pathways in primary liver cancer.
title_full Epigenomic annotation of noncoding mutations identifies mutated pathways in primary liver cancer.
title_fullStr Epigenomic annotation of noncoding mutations identifies mutated pathways in primary liver cancer.
title_full_unstemmed Epigenomic annotation of noncoding mutations identifies mutated pathways in primary liver cancer.
title_sort epigenomic annotation of noncoding mutations identifies mutated pathways in primary liver cancer.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Evidence that noncoding mutation can result in cancer driver events is mounting. However, it is more difficult to assign molecular biological consequences to noncoding mutations than to coding mutations, and a typical cancer genome contains many more noncoding mutations than protein-coding mutations. Accordingly, parsing functional noncoding mutation signal from noise remains an important challenge. Here we use an empirical approach to identify putatively functional noncoding somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) from liver cancer genomes. Annotation of candidate variants by publicly available epigenome datasets finds that 40.5% of SNVs fall in regulatory elements. When assigned to specific regulatory elements, we find that the distribution of regulatory element mutation mirrors that of nonsynonymous coding mutation, where few regulatory elements are recurrently mutated in a patient population but many are singly mutated. We find potential gain-of-binding site events among candidate SNVs, suggesting a mechanism of action for these variants. When aggregating noncoding somatic mutation in promoters, we find that genes in the ERBB signaling and MAPK signaling pathways are significantly enriched for promoter mutations. Altogether, our results suggest that functional somatic SNVs in cancer are sporadic, but occasionally occur in regulatory elements and may affect phenotype by creating binding sites for transcriptional regulators. Accordingly, we propose that noncoding mutation should be formally accounted for when determining gene- and pathway-mutation burden in cancer.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5363827?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccaflowdon epigenomicannotationofnoncodingmutationsidentifiesmutatedpathwaysinprimarylivercancer
AT tingwang epigenomicannotationofnoncodingmutationsidentifiesmutatedpathwaysinprimarylivercancer
_version_ 1724859589146443776