A review of educational attainment measures for social survey research
This article is a review of issues associated with measuring education and using educational measures in social science research. The review is orientated towards researchers who undertake secondary analyses of large-scale micro-level social science datasets. The article begins with an outline of im...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2016-04-01
|
Series: | Methodological Innovations |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116638001 |
id |
doaj-4be27e6d55294159b747b8813abf15d6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4be27e6d55294159b747b8813abf15d62020-11-25T03:37:54ZengSAGE PublishingMethodological Innovations2059-79912016-04-01910.1177/2059799116638001A review of educational attainment measures for social survey researchRoxanne Connelly0Vernon Gayle1Paul S. Lambert2The University of Warwick, Coventry, UKThe University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKUniversity of Stirling, Stirling, UKThis article is a review of issues associated with measuring education and using educational measures in social science research. The review is orientated towards researchers who undertake secondary analyses of large-scale micro-level social science datasets. The article begins with an outline of important context, which impinges upon the measurement of education. The United Kingdom is the focus of this review, but similar issues apply to other nation states. We provide a critical introduction to the main approaches to measuring education in social survey research, which include measuring years of education, using categorical qualification based measures and scaling approaches. We advocate the use of established education measures to better facilitate comparability and replication. We conclude by making the recommendation that researchers place careful thought into which educational measure they select, and that researchers should routinely engage in appropriate sensitivity analyses.https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116638001 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Roxanne Connelly Vernon Gayle Paul S. Lambert |
spellingShingle |
Roxanne Connelly Vernon Gayle Paul S. Lambert A review of educational attainment measures for social survey research Methodological Innovations |
author_facet |
Roxanne Connelly Vernon Gayle Paul S. Lambert |
author_sort |
Roxanne Connelly |
title |
A review of educational attainment measures for social survey research |
title_short |
A review of educational attainment measures for social survey research |
title_full |
A review of educational attainment measures for social survey research |
title_fullStr |
A review of educational attainment measures for social survey research |
title_full_unstemmed |
A review of educational attainment measures for social survey research |
title_sort |
review of educational attainment measures for social survey research |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Methodological Innovations |
issn |
2059-7991 |
publishDate |
2016-04-01 |
description |
This article is a review of issues associated with measuring education and using educational measures in social science research. The review is orientated towards researchers who undertake secondary analyses of large-scale micro-level social science datasets. The article begins with an outline of important context, which impinges upon the measurement of education. The United Kingdom is the focus of this review, but similar issues apply to other nation states. We provide a critical introduction to the main approaches to measuring education in social survey research, which include measuring years of education, using categorical qualification based measures and scaling approaches. We advocate the use of established education measures to better facilitate comparability and replication. We conclude by making the recommendation that researchers place careful thought into which educational measure they select, and that researchers should routinely engage in appropriate sensitivity analyses. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116638001 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT roxanneconnelly areviewofeducationalattainmentmeasuresforsocialsurveyresearch AT vernongayle areviewofeducationalattainmentmeasuresforsocialsurveyresearch AT paulslambert areviewofeducationalattainmentmeasuresforsocialsurveyresearch AT roxanneconnelly reviewofeducationalattainmentmeasuresforsocialsurveyresearch AT vernongayle reviewofeducationalattainmentmeasuresforsocialsurveyresearch AT paulslambert reviewofeducationalattainmentmeasuresforsocialsurveyresearch |
_version_ |
1724543177080176640 |