Losing Touch: A Theology of Death for Michael Haneke’s Amour

This proposed theology of death for Michael Haneke’s Amour, a fraught but poignant piece of cinema, will employ Martin Heidegger’s existentialism to reframe the ethical structure of the film and apply a “lived theology” rejoinder to its perceived hopelessness. The proposal will address the question...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taylor Worley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-11-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/12/140
id doaj-4933ae2e15e545018b0572365f216d04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4933ae2e15e545018b0572365f216d042020-11-25T00:49:16ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442016-11-0171214010.3390/rel7120140rel7120140Losing Touch: A Theology of Death for Michael Haneke’s AmourTaylor Worley0Department of Philosophy, Trinity International University, 2065 Half Day Road, Village of Bannockburn, Deerfield, IL 60015, USAThis proposed theology of death for Michael Haneke’s Amour, a fraught but poignant piece of cinema, will employ Martin Heidegger’s existentialism to reframe the ethical structure of the film and apply a “lived theology” rejoinder to its perceived hopelessness. The proposal will address the question of ethics in relation to Haneke’s cinema, in particular his seemingly nihilistic perspective and confrontational style. To do so, it will revisit the film itself and examine the ways that Georges and Anne’s love is tested. Principally, we examine the film’s great question, which—in the filmmaker’s own words—is: “How do I cope with the suffering of a loved one?” With aid from the theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, this ‘lived theology’ proposal will attempt to give an account of love’s irrepressible strength in the midst of even astounding suffering. While Heidegger’s ethic of resoluteness calls for interiority and solitude, Bonhoeffer’s account of death more satisfactorily invokes a transcendent summons contained within our own pledges to loved ones. Such a theological reading of Haneke’s Amour will draw two distinct conclusions: first, the film exposes the superficiality of any hoped-for solitude or escape from a loved one’s death, and secondly, it demonstrates that the mutuality of authentic love entails impossible sacrifices.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/12/140Michael HanekeMartin HeideggerDietrich Bonhoeffercinemadeathloveexistentialism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Taylor Worley
spellingShingle Taylor Worley
Losing Touch: A Theology of Death for Michael Haneke’s Amour
Religions
Michael Haneke
Martin Heidegger
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
cinema
death
love
existentialism
author_facet Taylor Worley
author_sort Taylor Worley
title Losing Touch: A Theology of Death for Michael Haneke’s Amour
title_short Losing Touch: A Theology of Death for Michael Haneke’s Amour
title_full Losing Touch: A Theology of Death for Michael Haneke’s Amour
title_fullStr Losing Touch: A Theology of Death for Michael Haneke’s Amour
title_full_unstemmed Losing Touch: A Theology of Death for Michael Haneke’s Amour
title_sort losing touch: a theology of death for michael haneke’s amour
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2016-11-01
description This proposed theology of death for Michael Haneke’s Amour, a fraught but poignant piece of cinema, will employ Martin Heidegger’s existentialism to reframe the ethical structure of the film and apply a “lived theology” rejoinder to its perceived hopelessness. The proposal will address the question of ethics in relation to Haneke’s cinema, in particular his seemingly nihilistic perspective and confrontational style. To do so, it will revisit the film itself and examine the ways that Georges and Anne’s love is tested. Principally, we examine the film’s great question, which—in the filmmaker’s own words—is: “How do I cope with the suffering of a loved one?” With aid from the theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, this ‘lived theology’ proposal will attempt to give an account of love’s irrepressible strength in the midst of even astounding suffering. While Heidegger’s ethic of resoluteness calls for interiority and solitude, Bonhoeffer’s account of death more satisfactorily invokes a transcendent summons contained within our own pledges to loved ones. Such a theological reading of Haneke’s Amour will draw two distinct conclusions: first, the film exposes the superficiality of any hoped-for solitude or escape from a loved one’s death, and secondly, it demonstrates that the mutuality of authentic love entails impossible sacrifices.
topic Michael Haneke
Martin Heidegger
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
cinema
death
love
existentialism
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/12/140
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorworley losingtouchatheologyofdeathformichaelhanekesamour
_version_ 1725252058565574656