A Publicly Available Simulation of Battery Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Gas-Powered Vehicles

Volatility in energy markets has made the purchase of battery electric vehicles (BEV) or hybrid vehicles (HEVs) attractive versus internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). However, the total cost of ownership (TCO) and true environmental effects, are difficult to assess. This study provides a pub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lawrence Fulton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2569
id doaj-44c84af47765442ea5e4680627b70091
record_format Article
spelling doaj-44c84af47765442ea5e4680627b700912020-11-25T02:18:54ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-05-01132569256910.3390/en13102569A Publicly Available Simulation of Battery Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Gas-Powered VehiclesLawrence Fulton0Department of Health Administration, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USAVolatility in energy markets has made the purchase of battery electric vehicles (BEV) or hybrid vehicles (HEVs) attractive versus internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). However, the total cost of ownership (TCO) and true environmental effects, are difficult to assess. This study provides a publicly available, user-driven simulation that estimates the consumer and environmental costs for various vehicle purchase options, supporting policymaker, producer, and consumer information requirements. It appears to be the first to provide a publicly available, user interactive simulation that compares two purchase options simultaneously. It is likely that the first paper to simulate the effects of solar recharging of electric vehicles (EV) on both cost-benefit for the consumer and environmental benefit (e.g., carbon dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, non-methane organic gasses, particulate matter, and formaldehyde) simultaneously, demonstrating how, as an example, solar-based charging of BEVs and HEVs reduces carbon emissions over grid-based charging. Two specific scenarios are explicated, and the results of show early break-even for both BEV and Plug-in HEV (PHEV) options over ICEV (13 months, and 12 months, respectively) with CO<sub>2</sub> emissions about ½ that of the gasoline option (including production emissions.) The results of these simulations are congruent with previous research that identified quick break-even for HEVs versus ICEV.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2569simulationelectric vehiclesbattery electric vehiclesplug-in hybrid
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lawrence Fulton
spellingShingle Lawrence Fulton
A Publicly Available Simulation of Battery Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Gas-Powered Vehicles
Energies
simulation
electric vehicles
battery electric vehicles
plug-in hybrid
author_facet Lawrence Fulton
author_sort Lawrence Fulton
title A Publicly Available Simulation of Battery Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Gas-Powered Vehicles
title_short A Publicly Available Simulation of Battery Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Gas-Powered Vehicles
title_full A Publicly Available Simulation of Battery Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Gas-Powered Vehicles
title_fullStr A Publicly Available Simulation of Battery Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Gas-Powered Vehicles
title_full_unstemmed A Publicly Available Simulation of Battery Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Gas-Powered Vehicles
title_sort publicly available simulation of battery electric, hybrid electric, and gas-powered vehicles
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Volatility in energy markets has made the purchase of battery electric vehicles (BEV) or hybrid vehicles (HEVs) attractive versus internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). However, the total cost of ownership (TCO) and true environmental effects, are difficult to assess. This study provides a publicly available, user-driven simulation that estimates the consumer and environmental costs for various vehicle purchase options, supporting policymaker, producer, and consumer information requirements. It appears to be the first to provide a publicly available, user interactive simulation that compares two purchase options simultaneously. It is likely that the first paper to simulate the effects of solar recharging of electric vehicles (EV) on both cost-benefit for the consumer and environmental benefit (e.g., carbon dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, non-methane organic gasses, particulate matter, and formaldehyde) simultaneously, demonstrating how, as an example, solar-based charging of BEVs and HEVs reduces carbon emissions over grid-based charging. Two specific scenarios are explicated, and the results of show early break-even for both BEV and Plug-in HEV (PHEV) options over ICEV (13 months, and 12 months, respectively) with CO<sub>2</sub> emissions about ½ that of the gasoline option (including production emissions.) The results of these simulations are congruent with previous research that identified quick break-even for HEVs versus ICEV.
topic simulation
electric vehicles
battery electric vehicles
plug-in hybrid
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2569
work_keys_str_mv AT lawrencefulton apubliclyavailablesimulationofbatteryelectrichybridelectricandgaspoweredvehicles
AT lawrencefulton publiclyavailablesimulationofbatteryelectrichybridelectricandgaspoweredvehicles
_version_ 1724879982272970752