Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

Abstract Background Preprint usage is growing rapidly in the life sciences; however, questions remain on the relative quality of preprints when compared to published articles. An objective dimension of quality that is readily measurable is completeness of reporting, as transparency can improve the r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clarissa F. D. Carneiro, Victor G. S. Queiroz, Thiago C. Moulin, Carlos A. M. Carvalho, Clarissa B. Haas, Danielle Rayêe, David E. Henshall, Evandro A. De-Souza, Felippe E. Amorim, Flávia Z. Boos, Gerson D. Guercio, Igor R. Costa, Karina L. Hajdu, Lieve van Egmond, Martin Modrák, Pedro B. Tan, Richard J. Abdill, Steven J. Burgess, Sylvia F. S. Guerra, Vanessa T. Bortoluzzi, Olavo B. Amaral
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-12-01
Series:Research Integrity and Peer Review
Subjects:
Quality of reporting
Preprint
Peer review
Publication
bioRxiv
Scientific journal
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3

Internet

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3

Similar Items