TEMA and Dot Enumeration Profiles Predict Mental Addition Problem Solving Speed Longitudinally

Different math indices can be used to assess math potential at school entry. We evaluated whether standardized math achievement (TEMA-2 performance), core number abilities (dot enumeration, symbolic magnitude comparison), non-verbal intelligence (NVIQ) and visuo-spatial working memory (VSWM), in com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clare S. Major, Jacob M. Paul, Robert A. Reeve
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02263/full
id doaj-3c6b431780774ae297701a315569e398
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c6b431780774ae297701a315569e3982020-11-25T00:13:18ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782017-12-01810.3389/fpsyg.2017.02263313803TEMA and Dot Enumeration Profiles Predict Mental Addition Problem Solving Speed LongitudinallyClare S. MajorJacob M. PaulRobert A. ReeveDifferent math indices can be used to assess math potential at school entry. We evaluated whether standardized math achievement (TEMA-2 performance), core number abilities (dot enumeration, symbolic magnitude comparison), non-verbal intelligence (NVIQ) and visuo-spatial working memory (VSWM), in combination or separately, predicted mental addition problem solving speed over time. We assessed 267 children’s TEMA-2, magnitude comparison, dot enumeration, and VSWM abilities at school entry (5 years) and NVIQ at 8 years. Mental addition problem solving speed was assessed at 6, 8, and 10 years. Longitudinal path analysis supported a model in which dot enumeration performance ability profiles and previous mental addition speed predicted future mental addition speed on all occasions, supporting a componential account of math ability. Standardized math achievement and NVIQ predicted mental addition speed at specific time points, while VSWM and symbolic magnitude comparison did not contribute unique variance to the model. The implications of using standardized math achievement and dot enumeration ability to index math learning potential at school entry are discussed.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02263/fulldot enumeration profileslongitudinal data analysisschool entry math abilityassessment and diagnosisimplications for intervention
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clare S. Major
Jacob M. Paul
Robert A. Reeve
spellingShingle Clare S. Major
Jacob M. Paul
Robert A. Reeve
TEMA and Dot Enumeration Profiles Predict Mental Addition Problem Solving Speed Longitudinally
Frontiers in Psychology
dot enumeration profiles
longitudinal data analysis
school entry math ability
assessment and diagnosis
implications for intervention
author_facet Clare S. Major
Jacob M. Paul
Robert A. Reeve
author_sort Clare S. Major
title TEMA and Dot Enumeration Profiles Predict Mental Addition Problem Solving Speed Longitudinally
title_short TEMA and Dot Enumeration Profiles Predict Mental Addition Problem Solving Speed Longitudinally
title_full TEMA and Dot Enumeration Profiles Predict Mental Addition Problem Solving Speed Longitudinally
title_fullStr TEMA and Dot Enumeration Profiles Predict Mental Addition Problem Solving Speed Longitudinally
title_full_unstemmed TEMA and Dot Enumeration Profiles Predict Mental Addition Problem Solving Speed Longitudinally
title_sort tema and dot enumeration profiles predict mental addition problem solving speed longitudinally
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Different math indices can be used to assess math potential at school entry. We evaluated whether standardized math achievement (TEMA-2 performance), core number abilities (dot enumeration, symbolic magnitude comparison), non-verbal intelligence (NVIQ) and visuo-spatial working memory (VSWM), in combination or separately, predicted mental addition problem solving speed over time. We assessed 267 children’s TEMA-2, magnitude comparison, dot enumeration, and VSWM abilities at school entry (5 years) and NVIQ at 8 years. Mental addition problem solving speed was assessed at 6, 8, and 10 years. Longitudinal path analysis supported a model in which dot enumeration performance ability profiles and previous mental addition speed predicted future mental addition speed on all occasions, supporting a componential account of math ability. Standardized math achievement and NVIQ predicted mental addition speed at specific time points, while VSWM and symbolic magnitude comparison did not contribute unique variance to the model. The implications of using standardized math achievement and dot enumeration ability to index math learning potential at school entry are discussed.
topic dot enumeration profiles
longitudinal data analysis
school entry math ability
assessment and diagnosis
implications for intervention
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02263/full
work_keys_str_mv AT claresmajor temaanddotenumerationprofilespredictmentaladditionproblemsolvingspeedlongitudinally
AT jacobmpaul temaanddotenumerationprofilespredictmentaladditionproblemsolvingspeedlongitudinally
AT robertareeve temaanddotenumerationprofilespredictmentaladditionproblemsolvingspeedlongitudinally
_version_ 1725395084692684800