Neuromuscular Adaptations to Low-Load Blood Flow Restricted Resistance Training

Low-load blood flow restricted (BFR) resistance exercise has been suggested to be as effective as moderate and high-load resistance training for increasing muscle size and strength. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of 6 weeks of HL or low-load BFR resistance training on neuromusc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Summer B. Cook, Brendan R. Scott, Katherine L. Hayes, Bethany G. Murphy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Uludag 2018-03-01
Series:Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jssm.org/hf.php?id=jssm-17-66.xml
id doaj-3beea0d027f542dd9bf50b5ecef1cdfb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3beea0d027f542dd9bf50b5ecef1cdfb2020-11-24T22:20:30ZengUniversity of UludagJournal of Sports Science and Medicine1303-29682018-03-011716673Neuromuscular Adaptations to Low-Load Blood Flow Restricted Resistance TrainingSummer B. Cook, Brendan R. Scott, Katherine L. Hayes, Bethany G. Murphy0Department of Kinesiology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USALow-load blood flow restricted (BFR) resistance exercise has been suggested to be as effective as moderate and high-load resistance training for increasing muscle size and strength. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of 6 weeks of HL or low-load BFR resistance training on neuromuscular function, strength, and hypertrophy of the knee extensors. Eighteen participants aged 18-22 years old were randomized to one of three training groups: moderate load (ML: 70% of 1 repetition maximum [1-RM]); BFR (20% 1-RM with a vascular restriction set to ~180 mmHg); and a control group (CON) that did not exercise. Participants performed leg extension (LE) and leg press exercises 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Measurements of isometric torque, LE 1-RM, central activation, electrically evoked torque, and muscle volume of the knee extensors were obtained before and after training. Isometric peak torque did not change following the training (p = 0.13). LE 1-RM improved in the ML (34 ± 20%; d = 0.78) and BFR (14 ± 5%; d = 0.67) groups compared to the CON group (0.6 ± 8%; d = 0.09; time x group interaction p = 0.02). Muscle volume increased in the ML (5.6%; d = 0.19) and BFR groups (2.5%; d = 0.09) with no change in the CON group (time x group interaction p = 0.001). There were no changes in central activation and evoked torque in any groups following the training (p > 0.05). Strength and hypertrophy were evident following ML and BFR resistance training programs indicating that both modalities are effective, although ML training appears to be a more potent and efficient. Neuromuscular changes were not evident and warrant more research.http://jssm.org/hf.php?id=jssm-17-66.xmlStrength trainingcentral activation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Summer B. Cook, Brendan R. Scott, Katherine L. Hayes, Bethany G. Murphy
spellingShingle Summer B. Cook, Brendan R. Scott, Katherine L. Hayes, Bethany G. Murphy
Neuromuscular Adaptations to Low-Load Blood Flow Restricted Resistance Training
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Strength training
central activation
author_facet Summer B. Cook, Brendan R. Scott, Katherine L. Hayes, Bethany G. Murphy
author_sort Summer B. Cook, Brendan R. Scott, Katherine L. Hayes, Bethany G. Murphy
title Neuromuscular Adaptations to Low-Load Blood Flow Restricted Resistance Training
title_short Neuromuscular Adaptations to Low-Load Blood Flow Restricted Resistance Training
title_full Neuromuscular Adaptations to Low-Load Blood Flow Restricted Resistance Training
title_fullStr Neuromuscular Adaptations to Low-Load Blood Flow Restricted Resistance Training
title_full_unstemmed Neuromuscular Adaptations to Low-Load Blood Flow Restricted Resistance Training
title_sort neuromuscular adaptations to low-load blood flow restricted resistance training
publisher University of Uludag
series Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
issn 1303-2968
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Low-load blood flow restricted (BFR) resistance exercise has been suggested to be as effective as moderate and high-load resistance training for increasing muscle size and strength. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of 6 weeks of HL or low-load BFR resistance training on neuromuscular function, strength, and hypertrophy of the knee extensors. Eighteen participants aged 18-22 years old were randomized to one of three training groups: moderate load (ML: 70% of 1 repetition maximum [1-RM]); BFR (20% 1-RM with a vascular restriction set to ~180 mmHg); and a control group (CON) that did not exercise. Participants performed leg extension (LE) and leg press exercises 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Measurements of isometric torque, LE 1-RM, central activation, electrically evoked torque, and muscle volume of the knee extensors were obtained before and after training. Isometric peak torque did not change following the training (p = 0.13). LE 1-RM improved in the ML (34 ± 20%; d = 0.78) and BFR (14 ± 5%; d = 0.67) groups compared to the CON group (0.6 ± 8%; d = 0.09; time x group interaction p = 0.02). Muscle volume increased in the ML (5.6%; d = 0.19) and BFR groups (2.5%; d = 0.09) with no change in the CON group (time x group interaction p = 0.001). There were no changes in central activation and evoked torque in any groups following the training (p > 0.05). Strength and hypertrophy were evident following ML and BFR resistance training programs indicating that both modalities are effective, although ML training appears to be a more potent and efficient. Neuromuscular changes were not evident and warrant more research.
topic Strength training
central activation
url http://jssm.org/hf.php?id=jssm-17-66.xml
work_keys_str_mv AT summerbcookbrendanrscottkatherinelhayesbethanygmurphy neuromuscularadaptationstolowloadbloodflowrestrictedresistancetraining
_version_ 1725774888964194304