Against the Standards: Analyzing Expectations and Discourse of Educators regarding Students with Disabilities in a Kindergarten Classroom

This two-year ethnographic case study critically examines the language educators use to describe students with disabilities who are considered to present challenging behaviors in one classroom. Focusing on the language and practices used by one special education teacher and three teaching assistants...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fernanda T. Orsati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:Education Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/325430
id doaj-3b1bb7bdd4df44f2b700453dd808f21a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3b1bb7bdd4df44f2b700453dd808f21a2020-11-25T00:53:02ZengHindawi LimitedEducation Research International2090-40022090-40102014-01-01201410.1155/2014/325430325430Against the Standards: Analyzing Expectations and Discourse of Educators regarding Students with Disabilities in a Kindergarten ClassroomFernanda T. Orsati0Hussman Institute for Autism, 5521 Research Park Drive, Catonsville, MD 21228, USAThis two-year ethnographic case study critically examines the language educators use to describe students with disabilities who are considered to present challenging behaviors in one classroom. Focusing on the language and practices used by one special education teacher and three teaching assistants, this paper explores how educators respond to students’ behaviors by analyzing educators’ utterances and the implication of such use for the education of the students. Using critical discourse analysis, this paper highlights how educators’ language in the classroom reflects a discourse of expectations that is based on various social standards and pressures that educators have to juggle. Educators expressed academic and behavioral standards by comparing students’ performance to the expected norm as well as through comparisons between students. Based on such comparisons, some students were constructed as always lacking and ultimately defined by the adjectives originally used to describe them. Students were perceived to embody defiance or smartness, the characteristics by which they were defined.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/325430
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fernanda T. Orsati
spellingShingle Fernanda T. Orsati
Against the Standards: Analyzing Expectations and Discourse of Educators regarding Students with Disabilities in a Kindergarten Classroom
Education Research International
author_facet Fernanda T. Orsati
author_sort Fernanda T. Orsati
title Against the Standards: Analyzing Expectations and Discourse of Educators regarding Students with Disabilities in a Kindergarten Classroom
title_short Against the Standards: Analyzing Expectations and Discourse of Educators regarding Students with Disabilities in a Kindergarten Classroom
title_full Against the Standards: Analyzing Expectations and Discourse of Educators regarding Students with Disabilities in a Kindergarten Classroom
title_fullStr Against the Standards: Analyzing Expectations and Discourse of Educators regarding Students with Disabilities in a Kindergarten Classroom
title_full_unstemmed Against the Standards: Analyzing Expectations and Discourse of Educators regarding Students with Disabilities in a Kindergarten Classroom
title_sort against the standards: analyzing expectations and discourse of educators regarding students with disabilities in a kindergarten classroom
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Education Research International
issn 2090-4002
2090-4010
publishDate 2014-01-01
description This two-year ethnographic case study critically examines the language educators use to describe students with disabilities who are considered to present challenging behaviors in one classroom. Focusing on the language and practices used by one special education teacher and three teaching assistants, this paper explores how educators respond to students’ behaviors by analyzing educators’ utterances and the implication of such use for the education of the students. Using critical discourse analysis, this paper highlights how educators’ language in the classroom reflects a discourse of expectations that is based on various social standards and pressures that educators have to juggle. Educators expressed academic and behavioral standards by comparing students’ performance to the expected norm as well as through comparisons between students. Based on such comparisons, some students were constructed as always lacking and ultimately defined by the adjectives originally used to describe them. Students were perceived to embody defiance or smartness, the characteristics by which they were defined.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/325430
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandatorsati againstthestandardsanalyzingexpectationsanddiscourseofeducatorsregardingstudentswithdisabilitiesinakindergartenclassroom
_version_ 1725239539161628672