Understanding the linkage gap between L2 education researchers and teachers
This paper reports the results of a mixed-method study that analyzed second language (L2) teachers’ and researchers’ interactions on an online forum organized to facilitate the discussion of six published articles written by the participating researchers. The project used Lavis et al.’s (2003) knowl...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Brock University
2015-10-01
|
Series: | Brock Education: a Journal of Educational Research and Practice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://brock.scholarsportal.info/journals/brocked/home/article/view/409 |
id |
doaj-3a3f579518fe4e998e5344fd3cfafd56 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3a3f579518fe4e998e5344fd3cfafd562020-11-25T01:14:55ZengBrock UniversityBrock Education: a Journal of Educational Research and Practice1183-11891183-11892015-10-01242250Understanding the linkage gap between L2 education researchers and teachersIbtissem Knouzi0Callie Mady1University of TorontoNipissing UniversityThis paper reports the results of a mixed-method study that analyzed second language (L2) teachers’ and researchers’ interactions on an online forum organized to facilitate the discussion of six published articles written by the participating researchers. The project used Lavis et al.’s (2003) knowledge transfer framework and Graham et al. (2006) knowledge to action framework as foundations to create shared space with the view to addressing the linkage gap between L2 researchers and L2 teachers. It specifically created a virtual space for dialogue and brought the two groups together to discuss topics of common interest. The asynchronous interaction produced a text-based set of data that reflected the ideational and linguistic choices of the participants. We use textlinguistic analysis procedures and refer to Gee’s (1990) Discourse theory to interpret these choices and understand how they shaped the direction and content of the interaction between researchers and practitioners.https://brock.scholarsportal.info/journals/brocked/home/article/view/409linkage gapregister analysisasynchronous text-based communication |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ibtissem Knouzi Callie Mady |
spellingShingle |
Ibtissem Knouzi Callie Mady Understanding the linkage gap between L2 education researchers and teachers Brock Education: a Journal of Educational Research and Practice linkage gap register analysis asynchronous text-based communication |
author_facet |
Ibtissem Knouzi Callie Mady |
author_sort |
Ibtissem Knouzi |
title |
Understanding the linkage gap between L2 education researchers and teachers |
title_short |
Understanding the linkage gap between L2 education researchers and teachers |
title_full |
Understanding the linkage gap between L2 education researchers and teachers |
title_fullStr |
Understanding the linkage gap between L2 education researchers and teachers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Understanding the linkage gap between L2 education researchers and teachers |
title_sort |
understanding the linkage gap between l2 education researchers and teachers |
publisher |
Brock University |
series |
Brock Education: a Journal of Educational Research and Practice |
issn |
1183-1189 1183-1189 |
publishDate |
2015-10-01 |
description |
This paper reports the results of a mixed-method study that analyzed second language (L2) teachers’ and researchers’ interactions on an online forum organized to facilitate the discussion of six published articles written by the participating researchers. The project used Lavis et al.’s (2003) knowledge transfer framework and Graham et al. (2006) knowledge to action framework as foundations to create shared space with the view to addressing the linkage gap between L2 researchers and L2 teachers. It specifically created a virtual space for dialogue and brought the two groups together to discuss topics of common interest. The asynchronous interaction produced a text-based set of data that reflected the ideational and linguistic choices of the participants. We use textlinguistic analysis procedures and refer to Gee’s (1990) Discourse theory to interpret these choices and understand how they shaped the direction and content of the interaction between researchers and practitioners. |
topic |
linkage gap register analysis asynchronous text-based communication |
url |
https://brock.scholarsportal.info/journals/brocked/home/article/view/409 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ibtissemknouzi understandingthelinkagegapbetweenl2educationresearchersandteachers AT calliemady understandingthelinkagegapbetweenl2educationresearchersandteachers |
_version_ |
1725155585980104704 |