Towards a contingent model of key staff retention: The new psychological contract reconsidered

Theories and evidence of widespread changes in employment relationships abound in literature. The organisational environment is increasingly characterised by mandates of flexibility, reorganisation, reengineering and downsizing. As a result, traditional perceptions of what is owed between an employe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gregory Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2001-03-01
Series:South African Journal of Business Management
Online Access:https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/711
id doaj-3999dfe5a67f410ba9ec314b78ecc4df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3999dfe5a67f410ba9ec314b78ecc4df2021-02-02T06:17:17ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Business Management2078-55852078-59762001-03-013211910.4102/sajbm.v32i1.711431Towards a contingent model of key staff retention: The new psychological contract reconsideredGregory Lee0School of Economic and Business Sciences, University of the WitwatersrandTheories and evidence of widespread changes in employment relationships abound in literature. The organisational environment is increasingly characterised by mandates of flexibility, reorganisation, reengineering and downsizing. As a result, traditional perceptions of what is owed between an employee and an organisation are subject to reappraisal. Such perceptions are encapsulated by the concept of the ‘psychological contract’. Evidence suggests that in the transient global business environment, the psychological contract of employees and organisational representatives may be shifting towards a far more transactional paradigm. Transactional contracts describe perceptions that employment obligations are more short-term, work content based and less relational. However in the case of key employee groups, such transactional relationships may conflict with an organisation’s need to retain its core skills and knowledge that form one of its only truly sustainable competitive advantages. Therefore divergent and varied psychological contracts increase the difficulty of decisions regarding the long-term retention of key employees. An explanatory model is therefore presented here, allowing for the various permutations and effects on key staff retention that may arise from such differing perceptions. Organisational solutions and research propositions are suggested for future research.https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/711
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gregory Lee
spellingShingle Gregory Lee
Towards a contingent model of key staff retention: The new psychological contract reconsidered
South African Journal of Business Management
author_facet Gregory Lee
author_sort Gregory Lee
title Towards a contingent model of key staff retention: The new psychological contract reconsidered
title_short Towards a contingent model of key staff retention: The new psychological contract reconsidered
title_full Towards a contingent model of key staff retention: The new psychological contract reconsidered
title_fullStr Towards a contingent model of key staff retention: The new psychological contract reconsidered
title_full_unstemmed Towards a contingent model of key staff retention: The new psychological contract reconsidered
title_sort towards a contingent model of key staff retention: the new psychological contract reconsidered
publisher AOSIS
series South African Journal of Business Management
issn 2078-5585
2078-5976
publishDate 2001-03-01
description Theories and evidence of widespread changes in employment relationships abound in literature. The organisational environment is increasingly characterised by mandates of flexibility, reorganisation, reengineering and downsizing. As a result, traditional perceptions of what is owed between an employee and an organisation are subject to reappraisal. Such perceptions are encapsulated by the concept of the ‘psychological contract’. Evidence suggests that in the transient global business environment, the psychological contract of employees and organisational representatives may be shifting towards a far more transactional paradigm. Transactional contracts describe perceptions that employment obligations are more short-term, work content based and less relational. However in the case of key employee groups, such transactional relationships may conflict with an organisation’s need to retain its core skills and knowledge that form one of its only truly sustainable competitive advantages. Therefore divergent and varied psychological contracts increase the difficulty of decisions regarding the long-term retention of key employees. An explanatory model is therefore presented here, allowing for the various permutations and effects on key staff retention that may arise from such differing perceptions. Organisational solutions and research propositions are suggested for future research.
url https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/711
work_keys_str_mv AT gregorylee towardsacontingentmodelofkeystaffretentionthenewpsychologicalcontractreconsidered
_version_ 1724301604505518080