Doctors’ attitudes to, beliefs about, and experiences of the regulation of professional competence: a scoping review protocol

Doctors’ attitudes to, beliefs about, and experiences of the regulation of professional competence: a scoping review protocol

Abstract Background Historically, individual doctors were responsible for maintaining their own professional competence. More recently, changing patient expectations, debate about the appropriateness of professional self-regulation, and high-profile cases of malpractice have led to a move towards fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anél Wiese, Emer Galvin, Charlotte Merrett, Irina Korotchikova, Dubhfeasa Slattery, Lucia Prihodova, Hilary Hoey, Ann O’Shaughnessy, Jantze Cotter, Janet O’Farrell, Mary Horgan, Deirdre Bennett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Regulation of professional competence
Scoping review
Revalidation
Recertification
Maintenance of certification
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-019-1132-3

Internet

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-019-1132-3

Similar Items