The Writing Teacher’s Second Self: Theory and Practice of Responding to Student Writing

Although rhetorical theorists such as N. Sommers (1988), C. H. Knoblauch and L. Brannon (1984), and E. M. White (1984) suggest that writing teachers insinuate clear and helpful readerpersonae in the written comments they make on student writing, this article focuses on students’ impressions of such...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wendell Mayo
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Vilnius University 2002-12-01
Series:Kalbotyra
Online Access:https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/kalbotyra/article/view/23340
id doaj-36e2fb92ad2e42fda987d041d88874b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-36e2fb92ad2e42fda987d041d88874b22021-03-30T09:27:38ZdeuVilnius UniversityKalbotyra 1392-15172029-83152002-12-01523The Writing Teacher’s Second Self: Theory and Practice of Responding to Student WritingWendell Mayo0Department of English, Bowling Green State University Although rhetorical theorists such as N. Sommers (1988), C. H. Knoblauch and L. Brannon (1984), and E. M. White (1984) suggest that writing teachers insinuate clear and helpful readerpersonae in the written comments they make on student writing, this article focuses on students’ impressions of such personae. The research employs A. A. Lunsford’s (1992) key topoi of teachers’ commentary on student writing in the United States, analysis of marked student essays, and interviews of student-authors to ascertain the relationships among the types of comments teachers make, the impressions these comments make on students, and their impact on students’ strategies for revising their writing. Results suggest that teachers’ comments in the third person impersonal paint of view, on form, and in the declarative or imperative modes suggest a ‘teacherly’ persona and students are more willing to adopt the comment and revise the text in question. Comments in the first person, on content, and in the interrogative mode suggest a ‘writerly’ persona, one that reinforces students’ identities as ‘writers’, though they are less likely to revise the text. https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/kalbotyra/article/view/23340
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wendell Mayo
spellingShingle Wendell Mayo
The Writing Teacher’s Second Self: Theory and Practice of Responding to Student Writing
Kalbotyra
author_facet Wendell Mayo
author_sort Wendell Mayo
title The Writing Teacher’s Second Self: Theory and Practice of Responding to Student Writing
title_short The Writing Teacher’s Second Self: Theory and Practice of Responding to Student Writing
title_full The Writing Teacher’s Second Self: Theory and Practice of Responding to Student Writing
title_fullStr The Writing Teacher’s Second Self: Theory and Practice of Responding to Student Writing
title_full_unstemmed The Writing Teacher’s Second Self: Theory and Practice of Responding to Student Writing
title_sort writing teacher’s second self: theory and practice of responding to student writing
publisher Vilnius University
series Kalbotyra
issn 1392-1517
2029-8315
publishDate 2002-12-01
description Although rhetorical theorists such as N. Sommers (1988), C. H. Knoblauch and L. Brannon (1984), and E. M. White (1984) suggest that writing teachers insinuate clear and helpful readerpersonae in the written comments they make on student writing, this article focuses on students’ impressions of such personae. The research employs A. A. Lunsford’s (1992) key topoi of teachers’ commentary on student writing in the United States, analysis of marked student essays, and interviews of student-authors to ascertain the relationships among the types of comments teachers make, the impressions these comments make on students, and their impact on students’ strategies for revising their writing. Results suggest that teachers’ comments in the third person impersonal paint of view, on form, and in the declarative or imperative modes suggest a ‘teacherly’ persona and students are more willing to adopt the comment and revise the text in question. Comments in the first person, on content, and in the interrogative mode suggest a ‘writerly’ persona, one that reinforces students’ identities as ‘writers’, though they are less likely to revise the text.
url https://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/kalbotyra/article/view/23340
work_keys_str_mv AT wendellmayo thewritingteacherssecondselftheoryandpracticeofrespondingtostudentwriting
AT wendellmayo writingteacherssecondselftheoryandpracticeofrespondingtostudentwriting
_version_ 1724180643625041920