Relations between an improving Swedish LEA and school principals with joint quality and improvement responsibilities

This study addresses a fundamental but neglected aspect of efforts to ensure quality and improvement in a decentralised school system: the relationship between the local education authority (LEA) and local school principals. Empirically, it is based on analysis of relevant documents and interviews w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mette Liljenberg, Klas Andersson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-08-01
Series:Education Inquiry
Subjects:
lea
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1802851
id doaj-36a898d23a4f4376a2c31b011cf3fb4a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-36a898d23a4f4376a2c31b011cf3fb4a2020-11-25T03:49:22ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEducation Inquiry2000-45082020-08-010011610.1080/20004508.2020.18028511802851Relations between an improving Swedish LEA and school principals with joint quality and improvement responsibilitiesMette Liljenberg0Klas Andersson1University of GothenburgUniversity of GothenburgThis study addresses a fundamental but neglected aspect of efforts to ensure quality and improvement in a decentralised school system: the relationship between the local education authority (LEA) and local school principals. Empirically, it is based on analysis of relevant documents and interviews with key actors in a Swedish LEA (a municipality), selected as a deviant and successful case. The data analysis is rooted in the theoretical concepts of sense-making and framing. The results show that to handle the joint responsibility the LEA introduced new artefacts for quality and improvement work. These included an expanded support unit for quality and improvement, a visionary document for all educational units and a system of tools and forums to expand quality work at local school level and stimulate collaboration between LEA-level actors and school principals. The principals saw a need for most of the artefacts and regarded them as useful. However, the analysis also reveals some negative resonance concerning relevance for the local schools and expectations of uniformity. In addition to presenting and discussing these findings, issues concerning trust and relationships are highlighted in this paper.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1802851leaprincipalsjoint responsibilityquality and improvementframe analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mette Liljenberg
Klas Andersson
spellingShingle Mette Liljenberg
Klas Andersson
Relations between an improving Swedish LEA and school principals with joint quality and improvement responsibilities
Education Inquiry
lea
principals
joint responsibility
quality and improvement
frame analysis
author_facet Mette Liljenberg
Klas Andersson
author_sort Mette Liljenberg
title Relations between an improving Swedish LEA and school principals with joint quality and improvement responsibilities
title_short Relations between an improving Swedish LEA and school principals with joint quality and improvement responsibilities
title_full Relations between an improving Swedish LEA and school principals with joint quality and improvement responsibilities
title_fullStr Relations between an improving Swedish LEA and school principals with joint quality and improvement responsibilities
title_full_unstemmed Relations between an improving Swedish LEA and school principals with joint quality and improvement responsibilities
title_sort relations between an improving swedish lea and school principals with joint quality and improvement responsibilities
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Education Inquiry
issn 2000-4508
publishDate 2020-08-01
description This study addresses a fundamental but neglected aspect of efforts to ensure quality and improvement in a decentralised school system: the relationship between the local education authority (LEA) and local school principals. Empirically, it is based on analysis of relevant documents and interviews with key actors in a Swedish LEA (a municipality), selected as a deviant and successful case. The data analysis is rooted in the theoretical concepts of sense-making and framing. The results show that to handle the joint responsibility the LEA introduced new artefacts for quality and improvement work. These included an expanded support unit for quality and improvement, a visionary document for all educational units and a system of tools and forums to expand quality work at local school level and stimulate collaboration between LEA-level actors and school principals. The principals saw a need for most of the artefacts and regarded them as useful. However, the analysis also reveals some negative resonance concerning relevance for the local schools and expectations of uniformity. In addition to presenting and discussing these findings, issues concerning trust and relationships are highlighted in this paper.
topic lea
principals
joint responsibility
quality and improvement
frame analysis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1802851
work_keys_str_mv AT metteliljenberg relationsbetweenanimprovingswedishleaandschoolprincipalswithjointqualityandimprovementresponsibilities
AT klasandersson relationsbetweenanimprovingswedishleaandschoolprincipalswithjointqualityandimprovementresponsibilities
_version_ 1724495961149931520