Mathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning

Abstract Background Although mathematics anxiety and self-efficacy are relatively well-researched, there are several uninvestigated terrains. In particular, there is little research on how mathematics anxiety and mathematics self-efficacy are associated with deep (more comprehensive) and surface (mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dmitri Rozgonjuk, Tiina Kraav, Kristel Mikkor, Kerli Orav-Puurand, Karin Täht
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-09-01
Series:International Journal of STEM Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-020-00246-z
id doaj-35b655812ca14954bb80ae967a164318
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35b655812ca14954bb80ae967a1643182020-11-25T01:56:09ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of STEM Education2196-78222020-09-017111110.1186/s40594-020-00246-zMathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learningDmitri Rozgonjuk0Tiina Kraav1Kristel Mikkor2Kerli Orav-Puurand3Karin Täht4Department of Molecular Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm UniversityInstitute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of TartuInstitute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of TartuInstitute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of TartuInstitute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of TartuAbstract Background Although mathematics anxiety and self-efficacy are relatively well-researched, there are several uninvestigated terrains. In particular, there is little research on how mathematics anxiety and mathematics self-efficacy are associated with deep (more comprehensive) and surface (more superficial) approaches to learning among STEM and social sciences students. The aim of the current work was to provide insights into this domain. Results Bivariate correlation analysis revealed that mathematics anxiety had a very high negative correlation with mathematics self-efficacy. However, while mathematics anxiety correlated positively with surface approach to learning in the STEM student sample, this association was not statistically significant in the social sciences student sample. Controlled for age and gender, regression analysis showed that lower mathematics self-efficacy and female gender predicted higher mathematics anxiety, while only mathematics self-efficacy predicted mathematics anxiety in the social sciences student sample. Interestingly, approaches to learning were not statistically significant predictors in multivariate analyses when mathematics self-efficacy was included. Conclusions The results suggest that mathematics self-efficacy plays a large role in mathematics anxiety. Therefore, one potential takeaway from the results of the current study is that perhaps improving students’ mathematics self-efficacy could also be helpful in reducing mathematics anxiety. Since the current study was cross-sectional, it could also be that reducing students’ mathematics anxiety could be helpful in boosting their mathematics self-efficacy. Future studies should aim to clarify the causal link in this relationship.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-020-00246-zMathematics anxietyMathematics self-efficacyApproaches to learningSTEMSocial sciences
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dmitri Rozgonjuk
Tiina Kraav
Kristel Mikkor
Kerli Orav-Puurand
Karin Täht
spellingShingle Dmitri Rozgonjuk
Tiina Kraav
Kristel Mikkor
Kerli Orav-Puurand
Karin Täht
Mathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning
International Journal of STEM Education
Mathematics anxiety
Mathematics self-efficacy
Approaches to learning
STEM
Social sciences
author_facet Dmitri Rozgonjuk
Tiina Kraav
Kristel Mikkor
Kerli Orav-Puurand
Karin Täht
author_sort Dmitri Rozgonjuk
title Mathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning
title_short Mathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning
title_full Mathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning
title_fullStr Mathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning
title_full_unstemmed Mathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning
title_sort mathematics anxiety among stem and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning
publisher SpringerOpen
series International Journal of STEM Education
issn 2196-7822
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Abstract Background Although mathematics anxiety and self-efficacy are relatively well-researched, there are several uninvestigated terrains. In particular, there is little research on how mathematics anxiety and mathematics self-efficacy are associated with deep (more comprehensive) and surface (more superficial) approaches to learning among STEM and social sciences students. The aim of the current work was to provide insights into this domain. Results Bivariate correlation analysis revealed that mathematics anxiety had a very high negative correlation with mathematics self-efficacy. However, while mathematics anxiety correlated positively with surface approach to learning in the STEM student sample, this association was not statistically significant in the social sciences student sample. Controlled for age and gender, regression analysis showed that lower mathematics self-efficacy and female gender predicted higher mathematics anxiety, while only mathematics self-efficacy predicted mathematics anxiety in the social sciences student sample. Interestingly, approaches to learning were not statistically significant predictors in multivariate analyses when mathematics self-efficacy was included. Conclusions The results suggest that mathematics self-efficacy plays a large role in mathematics anxiety. Therefore, one potential takeaway from the results of the current study is that perhaps improving students’ mathematics self-efficacy could also be helpful in reducing mathematics anxiety. Since the current study was cross-sectional, it could also be that reducing students’ mathematics anxiety could be helpful in boosting their mathematics self-efficacy. Future studies should aim to clarify the causal link in this relationship.
topic Mathematics anxiety
Mathematics self-efficacy
Approaches to learning
STEM
Social sciences
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-020-00246-z
work_keys_str_mv AT dmitrirozgonjuk mathematicsanxietyamongstemandsocialsciencesstudentstherolesofmathematicsselfefficacyanddeepandsurfaceapproachtolearning
AT tiinakraav mathematicsanxietyamongstemandsocialsciencesstudentstherolesofmathematicsselfefficacyanddeepandsurfaceapproachtolearning
AT kristelmikkor mathematicsanxietyamongstemandsocialsciencesstudentstherolesofmathematicsselfefficacyanddeepandsurfaceapproachtolearning
AT kerlioravpuurand mathematicsanxietyamongstemandsocialsciencesstudentstherolesofmathematicsselfefficacyanddeepandsurfaceapproachtolearning
AT karintaht mathematicsanxietyamongstemandsocialsciencesstudentstherolesofmathematicsselfefficacyanddeepandsurfaceapproachtolearning
_version_ 1724981160323317760