More than words: Contending semiotic systems and the role of disciplinary knowledge in specialized text comprehension

Comprehending multisemiotic texts has become a demanding task in all disciplinary domains, not only academic but also professional. Reading tables, pictures, graphs and words, as a whole or separately, is a challenge that most students must face. Nowadays there exists limited research available comb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giovanni Parodi, Cristóbal Julio
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 2017-04-01
Series:Ibérica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aelfe.org/documents/33_01_IBERICA.pdf
id doaj-3556bfd524d24596b3cb2c427acb5290
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3556bfd524d24596b3cb2c427acb52902020-11-24T23:57:49ZdeuAsociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines EspecíficosIbérica1139-72412340-27842017-04-0133041135More than words: Contending semiotic systems and the role of disciplinary knowledge in specialized text comprehensionGiovanni Parodi 0Cristóbal Julio 1Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (Chile) Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (Chile) Comprehending multisemiotic texts has become a demanding task in all disciplinary domains, not only academic but also professional. Reading tables, pictures, graphs and words, as a whole or separately, is a challenge that most students must face. Nowadays there exists limited research available combining descriptive and experimental data on this field of study. In this paper, we help fill this gap by combining linguistic corpus descriptions and experimental designs in order to assess reading capacity of university students. The general objective of the paper was to determine if it was possible to comprehend a passage from a disciplinary genre (Monetary Policy Report, MPR) through a single predominant semiotic system. In order to achieve this objective, an experiment with three versions of a text was designed: (a) the original text (verbal and graphs), (b) the text with predominance of graphs, and (c) the text with predominance of the verbal system. The participants were 151 students of a university program in the field of Economics in Chile. They were divided into two groups: first and third year university students respectively. Overall results show no statistically significant differences between the three conditions of the experiment for each group. Nonetheless, there are significant differences between the reading scores of both groups, particularly, when the texts were composed predominantly of only one semiotic system (verbal or graphs). No differences were determined in the texts that required an integrated reading of verbal and graph systems. Results indicate that students with a higher level of disciplinary insertion (third-year students) were able to comprehend information coded solely through graphs or words and produced a summary that contained the core semantic meaning of the texts given. These findings show that reading graphs is a skill that students acquire during instruction in specialized programs, by increasing their knowledge of disciplinary genres such as the MPR. http://www.aelfe.org/documents/33_01_IBERICA.pdfmultisemiotic written genresreading comprehensionspecialized textseconomics discourseMonetary Policy Report
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giovanni Parodi
Cristóbal Julio
spellingShingle Giovanni Parodi
Cristóbal Julio
More than words: Contending semiotic systems and the role of disciplinary knowledge in specialized text comprehension
Ibérica
multisemiotic written genres
reading comprehension
specialized texts
economics discourse
Monetary Policy Report
author_facet Giovanni Parodi
Cristóbal Julio
author_sort Giovanni Parodi
title More than words: Contending semiotic systems and the role of disciplinary knowledge in specialized text comprehension
title_short More than words: Contending semiotic systems and the role of disciplinary knowledge in specialized text comprehension
title_full More than words: Contending semiotic systems and the role of disciplinary knowledge in specialized text comprehension
title_fullStr More than words: Contending semiotic systems and the role of disciplinary knowledge in specialized text comprehension
title_full_unstemmed More than words: Contending semiotic systems and the role of disciplinary knowledge in specialized text comprehension
title_sort more than words: contending semiotic systems and the role of disciplinary knowledge in specialized text comprehension
publisher Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos
series Ibérica
issn 1139-7241
2340-2784
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Comprehending multisemiotic texts has become a demanding task in all disciplinary domains, not only academic but also professional. Reading tables, pictures, graphs and words, as a whole or separately, is a challenge that most students must face. Nowadays there exists limited research available combining descriptive and experimental data on this field of study. In this paper, we help fill this gap by combining linguistic corpus descriptions and experimental designs in order to assess reading capacity of university students. The general objective of the paper was to determine if it was possible to comprehend a passage from a disciplinary genre (Monetary Policy Report, MPR) through a single predominant semiotic system. In order to achieve this objective, an experiment with three versions of a text was designed: (a) the original text (verbal and graphs), (b) the text with predominance of graphs, and (c) the text with predominance of the verbal system. The participants were 151 students of a university program in the field of Economics in Chile. They were divided into two groups: first and third year university students respectively. Overall results show no statistically significant differences between the three conditions of the experiment for each group. Nonetheless, there are significant differences between the reading scores of both groups, particularly, when the texts were composed predominantly of only one semiotic system (verbal or graphs). No differences were determined in the texts that required an integrated reading of verbal and graph systems. Results indicate that students with a higher level of disciplinary insertion (third-year students) were able to comprehend information coded solely through graphs or words and produced a summary that contained the core semantic meaning of the texts given. These findings show that reading graphs is a skill that students acquire during instruction in specialized programs, by increasing their knowledge of disciplinary genres such as the MPR.
topic multisemiotic written genres
reading comprehension
specialized texts
economics discourse
Monetary Policy Report
url http://www.aelfe.org/documents/33_01_IBERICA.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT giovanniparodi morethanwordscontendingsemioticsystemsandtheroleofdisciplinaryknowledgeinspecializedtextcomprehension
AT cristobaljulio morethanwordscontendingsemioticsystemsandtheroleofdisciplinaryknowledgeinspecializedtextcomprehension
_version_ 1725453147221000192