The Quality of Canadian and U.S. Government Health Documents Remains Unchallenged Until Better Research Can Be Undertaken. A review of: Lambert, Frank. “Assessing the Authoritativeness of Canadian and American Health Documents: A Comparative Analysis Using Informetric Methodologies.” Government Information Quarterly 22.2 (2005): 277‐96.

The Quality of Canadian and U.S. Government Health Documents Remains Unchallenged Until Better Research Can Be Undertaken. A review of: Lambert, Frank. “Assessing the Authoritativeness of Canadian and American Health Documents: A Comparative Analysis Using Informetric Methodologies.” Government Information Quarterly 22.2 (2005): 277‐96.

<b>Objective</b> ‐ To assess by means of citation analysis whether the public trust afforded health documents published by the Canadian and U.S. governments is appropriate, and to ascertain whether differences in the respective health care systems influence how publications are produced....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael Corkett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alberta 2006-12-01
Series:Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Subjects:
Government Publications
Biomedical Information
Quality Assurance
Canada
United States
Online Access:http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/75/176

Internet

http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/75/176

Similar Items