Developing a team performance framework utilising Neethling’s thinking style preference instrument

Orientation: This article focuses on the employees and managers’ experience of the effects of Neethling’s thinking style preference instrument on team performance. Research purpose: The purpose of this study was to compile a framework to apply Neethling’s thinking style preferences to team performan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yvonne T. Joubert, Christine Swart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2019-11-01
Series:South African Journal of Human Resource Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/1203
id doaj-3300e983dfd147b68f6cce1c41dde644
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3300e983dfd147b68f6cce1c41dde6442020-11-25T02:20:16ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Human Resource Management1683-75842071-078X2019-11-01170e1e1110.4102/sajhrm.v17i0.1203522Developing a team performance framework utilising Neethling’s thinking style preference instrumentYvonne T. Joubert0Christine Swart1Department of Human Resource Management, School of Management Sciences, College of Economic and Management Sciences, University of South Africa, PretoriaDepartment of Human Resource Management, School of Management Sciences, College of Economic and Management Sciences, University of South Africa, PretoriaOrientation: This article focuses on the employees and managers’ experience of the effects of Neethling’s thinking style preference instrument on team performance. Research purpose: The purpose of this study was to compile a framework to apply Neethling’s thinking style preferences to team performance. Motivation for the study: Organisations today are aware that they need to increase quality, decrease costs, advance customer service, increase their adaptability to an increasingly competitive environment and decrease the time spent on creating new products. To realise these goals, organisations must convert their work teams into more cohesive and dedicated teams. No or limited research has been conducted on how the application of Neethling’s thinking style preferences may influence team performance. Research approach/design and method: A qualitative exploratory study was conducted with 19 participants working in the Financial and Insurance Department of a sales-driven organisation in Gauteng, South Africa. The data were collected by means of focus group and individual interviews. Main findings: The positive effects of the Neethling’s thinking style preferences on the team were that the participants understood people better, their conflict management skills increased, their self-awareness improved, the communication in the team increased and they experienced an increase in team cohesion. The negative experiences were task avoidance, labelling and wrong assessments of people, but the positive experiences exceeded the negative experiences. Due to the positive experiences, the organisation also benefitted in terms of improved customer service and increased productivity, which could lead to organisational success and a competitive advantage. Practical/managerial implications: When used in teamwork, the Neethling’s thinking style preference instrument shows positive outcomes regarding team performance. Contribution/value-add: The findings of this study contribute new knowledge regarding the application of Neethling’s thinking style preferences in team performance.https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/1203communicationconflict managementcustomer serviceneethling’s thinking style preferencesproductivityself-awarenessteam cohesionteam performance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yvonne T. Joubert
Christine Swart
spellingShingle Yvonne T. Joubert
Christine Swart
Developing a team performance framework utilising Neethling’s thinking style preference instrument
South African Journal of Human Resource Management
communication
conflict management
customer service
neethling’s thinking style preferences
productivity
self-awareness
team cohesion
team performance
author_facet Yvonne T. Joubert
Christine Swart
author_sort Yvonne T. Joubert
title Developing a team performance framework utilising Neethling’s thinking style preference instrument
title_short Developing a team performance framework utilising Neethling’s thinking style preference instrument
title_full Developing a team performance framework utilising Neethling’s thinking style preference instrument
title_fullStr Developing a team performance framework utilising Neethling’s thinking style preference instrument
title_full_unstemmed Developing a team performance framework utilising Neethling’s thinking style preference instrument
title_sort developing a team performance framework utilising neethling’s thinking style preference instrument
publisher AOSIS
series South African Journal of Human Resource Management
issn 1683-7584
2071-078X
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Orientation: This article focuses on the employees and managers’ experience of the effects of Neethling’s thinking style preference instrument on team performance. Research purpose: The purpose of this study was to compile a framework to apply Neethling’s thinking style preferences to team performance. Motivation for the study: Organisations today are aware that they need to increase quality, decrease costs, advance customer service, increase their adaptability to an increasingly competitive environment and decrease the time spent on creating new products. To realise these goals, organisations must convert their work teams into more cohesive and dedicated teams. No or limited research has been conducted on how the application of Neethling’s thinking style preferences may influence team performance. Research approach/design and method: A qualitative exploratory study was conducted with 19 participants working in the Financial and Insurance Department of a sales-driven organisation in Gauteng, South Africa. The data were collected by means of focus group and individual interviews. Main findings: The positive effects of the Neethling’s thinking style preferences on the team were that the participants understood people better, their conflict management skills increased, their self-awareness improved, the communication in the team increased and they experienced an increase in team cohesion. The negative experiences were task avoidance, labelling and wrong assessments of people, but the positive experiences exceeded the negative experiences. Due to the positive experiences, the organisation also benefitted in terms of improved customer service and increased productivity, which could lead to organisational success and a competitive advantage. Practical/managerial implications: When used in teamwork, the Neethling’s thinking style preference instrument shows positive outcomes regarding team performance. Contribution/value-add: The findings of this study contribute new knowledge regarding the application of Neethling’s thinking style preferences in team performance.
topic communication
conflict management
customer service
neethling’s thinking style preferences
productivity
self-awareness
team cohesion
team performance
url https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/1203
work_keys_str_mv AT yvonnetjoubert developingateamperformanceframeworkutilisingneethlingsthinkingstylepreferenceinstrument
AT christineswart developingateamperformanceframeworkutilisingneethlingsthinkingstylepreferenceinstrument
_version_ 1724872461841858560