Exploring Motivational Factors for Educational Reform: Do International Comparisons Dictate Educational Policy?

In mathematics education, utilizing international comparisons to support implementation of educational reforms has become increasingly common. With the advent of Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), educational reform seems to have transitioned to a reactionary process rath...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: AJ Stachelek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia University Libraries 2010-12-01
Series:Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College
Online Access:https://journals-test.library.columbia.edu/index.php/jmetc/article/view/692
id doaj-31664c5b05d64d56bcd6460e002cdec8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31664c5b05d64d56bcd6460e002cdec82020-11-25T03:09:30ZengColumbia University LibrariesJournal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College2156-14002156-13972010-12-0112Exploring Motivational Factors for Educational Reform: Do International Comparisons Dictate Educational Policy?AJ Stachelek0Teachers College Columbia UniversityIn mathematics education, utilizing international comparisons to support implementation of educational reforms has become increasingly common. With the advent of Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), educational reform seems to have transitioned to a reactionary process rather than a calculated adaptation of current educational systems. These policy changes may be in response to a need to demonstrate international superiority, determined by these standardized tests. This paper explores the history of educational reform in Japan and Singapore to investigate possible connections between achievement levels and reforms each country made to their educational systems. Frank’s Framework will be used to guide the analysis of their educational policies with a focus on how these countries use aspects of this framework to guide reform decisions, or if they use a narrow focus on the TIMSS results. These results can then be extended to the process of reform development in the United States.https://journals-test.library.columbia.edu/index.php/jmetc/article/view/692
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author AJ Stachelek
spellingShingle AJ Stachelek
Exploring Motivational Factors for Educational Reform: Do International Comparisons Dictate Educational Policy?
Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College
author_facet AJ Stachelek
author_sort AJ Stachelek
title Exploring Motivational Factors for Educational Reform: Do International Comparisons Dictate Educational Policy?
title_short Exploring Motivational Factors for Educational Reform: Do International Comparisons Dictate Educational Policy?
title_full Exploring Motivational Factors for Educational Reform: Do International Comparisons Dictate Educational Policy?
title_fullStr Exploring Motivational Factors for Educational Reform: Do International Comparisons Dictate Educational Policy?
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Motivational Factors for Educational Reform: Do International Comparisons Dictate Educational Policy?
title_sort exploring motivational factors for educational reform: do international comparisons dictate educational policy?
publisher Columbia University Libraries
series Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College
issn 2156-1400
2156-1397
publishDate 2010-12-01
description In mathematics education, utilizing international comparisons to support implementation of educational reforms has become increasingly common. With the advent of Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), educational reform seems to have transitioned to a reactionary process rather than a calculated adaptation of current educational systems. These policy changes may be in response to a need to demonstrate international superiority, determined by these standardized tests. This paper explores the history of educational reform in Japan and Singapore to investigate possible connections between achievement levels and reforms each country made to their educational systems. Frank’s Framework will be used to guide the analysis of their educational policies with a focus on how these countries use aspects of this framework to guide reform decisions, or if they use a narrow focus on the TIMSS results. These results can then be extended to the process of reform development in the United States.
url https://journals-test.library.columbia.edu/index.php/jmetc/article/view/692
work_keys_str_mv AT ajstachelek exploringmotivationalfactorsforeducationalreformdointernationalcomparisonsdictateeducationalpolicy
_version_ 1724662301438509056