Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia

Purpose: To investigate parameters related to fluency, reading comprehension and phonological processing (operational and short-term memory) and identify potential correlation between the variables in Dyslexia and in the absence of reading difficulties. Method: One hundred and fifteen students from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carolina Alves Ferreira De Carvalho, Adriana de Souza Batista Kida, Simone Aparecida Capellini, Clara Regina Brandão de Avila
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00746/full
id doaj-315af54de2fd4693aa2e215cb06a236f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-315af54de2fd4693aa2e215cb06a236f2020-11-24T23:14:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-07-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.00746100164Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexiaCarolina Alves Ferreira De Carvalho0Adriana de Souza Batista Kida1Simone Aparecida Capellini2Clara Regina Brandão de Avila3Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESPUniversidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESPUniversidade do Estado de São Paulo - UNESPUniversidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESPPurpose: To investigate parameters related to fluency, reading comprehension and phonological processing (operational and short-term memory) and identify potential correlation between the variables in Dyslexia and in the absence of reading difficulties. Method: One hundred and fifteen students from the third to eighth grade of elementary school were grouped into a Control Group (CG) and Group with Dyslexia (GDys). Reading of words, pseudowords and text (decoding); listening and reading comprehension; phonological short-term and working memory (repetition of pseudowords and Digit Span) were evaluated. Results: The comparison of the groups showed significant differences in decoding, phonological short-term memory (repetition of pseudowords) and answers to text-connecting questions (TC) on reading comprehension, with the worst performances identified for GDys. In this group there were negative correlations between pseudowords repetition and TC answers and total score, both on listening comprehension. No correlations were found between operational and short-term memory (Digit Span) and parameters of fluency and reading comprehension in dyslexia. For the sample without complaint, there were positive correlations between some parameters of reading fluency and repetition of pseudowords and also between answering literal questions in listening comprehension and repetition of digits on the direct and reverse order. There was no correlation with the parameters of reading comprehension. Conclusion: GDys and CG showed similar performance in listening comprehension and in understanding of explicit information and gap-filling inference on reading comprehension. Students of GDys showed worst performance in reading decoding, phonological short-term memory (pseudowords) and on inferences that depends on textual cohesion understanding in reading. There were negative correlations between pseudowords repetition and TC answers and total score, both in listening comprehension.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00746/fullComprehensionDyslexiaLanguageworking memoryreading
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carolina Alves Ferreira De Carvalho
Adriana de Souza Batista Kida
Simone Aparecida Capellini
Clara Regina Brandão de Avila
spellingShingle Carolina Alves Ferreira De Carvalho
Adriana de Souza Batista Kida
Simone Aparecida Capellini
Clara Regina Brandão de Avila
Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia
Frontiers in Psychology
Comprehension
Dyslexia
Language
working memory
reading
author_facet Carolina Alves Ferreira De Carvalho
Adriana de Souza Batista Kida
Simone Aparecida Capellini
Clara Regina Brandão de Avila
author_sort Carolina Alves Ferreira De Carvalho
title Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia
title_short Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia
title_full Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia
title_fullStr Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia
title_full_unstemmed Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia
title_sort phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-07-01
description Purpose: To investigate parameters related to fluency, reading comprehension and phonological processing (operational and short-term memory) and identify potential correlation between the variables in Dyslexia and in the absence of reading difficulties. Method: One hundred and fifteen students from the third to eighth grade of elementary school were grouped into a Control Group (CG) and Group with Dyslexia (GDys). Reading of words, pseudowords and text (decoding); listening and reading comprehension; phonological short-term and working memory (repetition of pseudowords and Digit Span) were evaluated. Results: The comparison of the groups showed significant differences in decoding, phonological short-term memory (repetition of pseudowords) and answers to text-connecting questions (TC) on reading comprehension, with the worst performances identified for GDys. In this group there were negative correlations between pseudowords repetition and TC answers and total score, both on listening comprehension. No correlations were found between operational and short-term memory (Digit Span) and parameters of fluency and reading comprehension in dyslexia. For the sample without complaint, there were positive correlations between some parameters of reading fluency and repetition of pseudowords and also between answering literal questions in listening comprehension and repetition of digits on the direct and reverse order. There was no correlation with the parameters of reading comprehension. Conclusion: GDys and CG showed similar performance in listening comprehension and in understanding of explicit information and gap-filling inference on reading comprehension. Students of GDys showed worst performance in reading decoding, phonological short-term memory (pseudowords) and on inferences that depends on textual cohesion understanding in reading. There were negative correlations between pseudowords repetition and TC answers and total score, both in listening comprehension.
topic Comprehension
Dyslexia
Language
working memory
reading
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00746/full
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinaalvesferreiradecarvalho phonologicalworkingmemoryandreadinginstudentswithdyslexia
AT adrianadesouzabatistakida phonologicalworkingmemoryandreadinginstudentswithdyslexia
AT simoneaparecidacapellini phonologicalworkingmemoryandreadinginstudentswithdyslexia
AT clarareginabrandaodeavila phonologicalworkingmemoryandreadinginstudentswithdyslexia
_version_ 1725594126862254080