Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia
Purpose: To investigate parameters related to fluency, reading comprehension and phonological processing (operational and short-term memory) and identify potential correlation between the variables in Dyslexia and in the absence of reading difficulties. Method: One hundred and fifteen students from...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014-07-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00746/full |
id |
doaj-315af54de2fd4693aa2e215cb06a236f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-315af54de2fd4693aa2e215cb06a236f2020-11-24T23:14:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-07-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.00746100164Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexiaCarolina Alves Ferreira De Carvalho0Adriana de Souza Batista Kida1Simone Aparecida Capellini2Clara Regina Brandão de Avila3Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESPUniversidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESPUniversidade do Estado de São Paulo - UNESPUniversidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESPPurpose: To investigate parameters related to fluency, reading comprehension and phonological processing (operational and short-term memory) and identify potential correlation between the variables in Dyslexia and in the absence of reading difficulties. Method: One hundred and fifteen students from the third to eighth grade of elementary school were grouped into a Control Group (CG) and Group with Dyslexia (GDys). Reading of words, pseudowords and text (decoding); listening and reading comprehension; phonological short-term and working memory (repetition of pseudowords and Digit Span) were evaluated. Results: The comparison of the groups showed significant differences in decoding, phonological short-term memory (repetition of pseudowords) and answers to text-connecting questions (TC) on reading comprehension, with the worst performances identified for GDys. In this group there were negative correlations between pseudowords repetition and TC answers and total score, both on listening comprehension. No correlations were found between operational and short-term memory (Digit Span) and parameters of fluency and reading comprehension in dyslexia. For the sample without complaint, there were positive correlations between some parameters of reading fluency and repetition of pseudowords and also between answering literal questions in listening comprehension and repetition of digits on the direct and reverse order. There was no correlation with the parameters of reading comprehension. Conclusion: GDys and CG showed similar performance in listening comprehension and in understanding of explicit information and gap-filling inference on reading comprehension. Students of GDys showed worst performance in reading decoding, phonological short-term memory (pseudowords) and on inferences that depends on textual cohesion understanding in reading. There were negative correlations between pseudowords repetition and TC answers and total score, both in listening comprehension.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00746/fullComprehensionDyslexiaLanguageworking memoryreading |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Carolina Alves Ferreira De Carvalho Adriana de Souza Batista Kida Simone Aparecida Capellini Clara Regina Brandão de Avila |
spellingShingle |
Carolina Alves Ferreira De Carvalho Adriana de Souza Batista Kida Simone Aparecida Capellini Clara Regina Brandão de Avila Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia Frontiers in Psychology Comprehension Dyslexia Language working memory reading |
author_facet |
Carolina Alves Ferreira De Carvalho Adriana de Souza Batista Kida Simone Aparecida Capellini Clara Regina Brandão de Avila |
author_sort |
Carolina Alves Ferreira De Carvalho |
title |
Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia |
title_short |
Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia |
title_full |
Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia |
title_fullStr |
Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia |
title_sort |
phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2014-07-01 |
description |
Purpose: To investigate parameters related to fluency, reading comprehension and phonological processing (operational and short-term memory) and identify potential correlation between the variables in Dyslexia and in the absence of reading difficulties. Method: One hundred and fifteen students from the third to eighth grade of elementary school were grouped into a Control Group (CG) and Group with Dyslexia (GDys). Reading of words, pseudowords and text (decoding); listening and reading comprehension; phonological short-term and working memory (repetition of pseudowords and Digit Span) were evaluated. Results: The comparison of the groups showed significant differences in decoding, phonological short-term memory (repetition of pseudowords) and answers to text-connecting questions (TC) on reading comprehension, with the worst performances identified for GDys. In this group there were negative correlations between pseudowords repetition and TC answers and total score, both on listening comprehension. No correlations were found between operational and short-term memory (Digit Span) and parameters of fluency and reading comprehension in dyslexia. For the sample without complaint, there were positive correlations between some parameters of reading fluency and repetition of pseudowords and also between answering literal questions in listening comprehension and repetition of digits on the direct and reverse order. There was no correlation with the parameters of reading comprehension. Conclusion: GDys and CG showed similar performance in listening comprehension and in understanding of explicit information and gap-filling inference on reading comprehension. Students of GDys showed worst performance in reading decoding, phonological short-term memory (pseudowords) and on inferences that depends on textual cohesion understanding in reading. There were negative correlations between pseudowords repetition and TC answers and total score, both in listening comprehension. |
topic |
Comprehension Dyslexia Language working memory reading |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00746/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT carolinaalvesferreiradecarvalho phonologicalworkingmemoryandreadinginstudentswithdyslexia AT adrianadesouzabatistakida phonologicalworkingmemoryandreadinginstudentswithdyslexia AT simoneaparecidacapellini phonologicalworkingmemoryandreadinginstudentswithdyslexia AT clarareginabrandaodeavila phonologicalworkingmemoryandreadinginstudentswithdyslexia |
_version_ |
1725594126862254080 |