Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial

Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Patients with refractory angina have significant morbidity. This study aimed to compare two of the treatment options, Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and Percutaneous Myocardial Laser Revascularisation (PMR) in terms of clinical outcom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khan SN, Goldsmith KA, Dyer M T, Sharples LD, Freeman C, Hardy I, Buxton MJ, Schofield PM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-06-01
Series:Trials
Online Access:http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/9/1/40

Internet

http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/9/1/40

Similar Items