How Swiss primary students interpret a national monument

Since historical monuments are often difficult to interpret, this study commences with the questions, how do students understand historical monuments and in what ways are they able to describe and interpret them? The focus of our paper is a monument showing Arnold Winkelried, a leading Swiss nation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian Mathis, Kristine Gollin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UCL Press 2018-09-01
Series:History Education Research Journal
Online Access:https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=f6082a25-bd03-4f62-aeb4-1b6ef20e60c5
id doaj-2e24e6a06a9c45d3947d7717ce81401e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2e24e6a06a9c45d3947d7717ce81401e2021-04-02T19:05:06ZengUCL PressHistory Education Research Journal2631-97132018-09-0110.18546/HERJ.15.2.15How Swiss primary students interpret a national monumentChristian MathisKristine GollinSince historical monuments are often difficult to interpret, this study commences with the questions, how do students understand historical monuments and in what ways are they able to describe and interpret them? The focus of our paper is a monument showing Arnold Winkelried, a leading Swiss national figure that nine Swiss students of Grades 5 and 6 studied. Winkelried is a legendary Swiss hero who sacrificed himself to bring about Swiss victory over the Austrian Habsburgs in the Battle of Sempach in 1386. As an iconic, symbolic source of Swiss national cultural heritage, he is representative of the establishment of the young Swiss Federation's history culture in the second half of the nineteenth century. The study's mainly oral research data was collected by means of focus groups (Bohnsack, 2010). The discussions with the students were recorded, transcribed and analysed using a documentary method (Straub, 1999), that is, we reconstructed typical patterns of description. The findings first indicated that students find it difficult to observe and describe such monuments appropriately. Indeed, the students tended to begin the process by guessing what they were observing. Second, the findings show that through the interviewer's prompts – accurate observations and descriptions – during the focus group sessions, students can activate prior knowledge and thus engage with the historical topic.https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=f6082a25-bd03-4f62-aeb4-1b6ef20e60c5
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christian Mathis
Kristine Gollin
spellingShingle Christian Mathis
Kristine Gollin
How Swiss primary students interpret a national monument
History Education Research Journal
author_facet Christian Mathis
Kristine Gollin
author_sort Christian Mathis
title How Swiss primary students interpret a national monument
title_short How Swiss primary students interpret a national monument
title_full How Swiss primary students interpret a national monument
title_fullStr How Swiss primary students interpret a national monument
title_full_unstemmed How Swiss primary students interpret a national monument
title_sort how swiss primary students interpret a national monument
publisher UCL Press
series History Education Research Journal
issn 2631-9713
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Since historical monuments are often difficult to interpret, this study commences with the questions, how do students understand historical monuments and in what ways are they able to describe and interpret them? The focus of our paper is a monument showing Arnold Winkelried, a leading Swiss national figure that nine Swiss students of Grades 5 and 6 studied. Winkelried is a legendary Swiss hero who sacrificed himself to bring about Swiss victory over the Austrian Habsburgs in the Battle of Sempach in 1386. As an iconic, symbolic source of Swiss national cultural heritage, he is representative of the establishment of the young Swiss Federation's history culture in the second half of the nineteenth century. The study's mainly oral research data was collected by means of focus groups (Bohnsack, 2010). The discussions with the students were recorded, transcribed and analysed using a documentary method (Straub, 1999), that is, we reconstructed typical patterns of description. The findings first indicated that students find it difficult to observe and describe such monuments appropriately. Indeed, the students tended to begin the process by guessing what they were observing. Second, the findings show that through the interviewer's prompts – accurate observations and descriptions – during the focus group sessions, students can activate prior knowledge and thus engage with the historical topic.
url https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=f6082a25-bd03-4f62-aeb4-1b6ef20e60c5
work_keys_str_mv AT christianmathis howswissprimarystudentsinterpretanationalmonument
AT kristinegollin howswissprimarystudentsinterpretanationalmonument
_version_ 1721549642549690368