Interaction, Critical Thinking, and Social Network Analysis (SNA) in Online Courses

This study tried to ascertain a possible relationship between the number of student moderators (1, 2, and 3), online interactions, and critical thinking of K-12 educators enrolled in an online course that was taught from a constructivist approach. The course topic was use of technology in special ed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joan Thormann, Samuel Gable, Patricia Seferlis Fidalgo, George Blakeslee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Athabasca University Press 2013-07-01
Series:International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1306/2537
id doaj-29dd139c4c92445da95a0c83ccded71f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-29dd139c4c92445da95a0c83ccded71f2020-11-25T01:34:27ZengAthabasca University PressInternational Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning1492-38312013-07-01143Interaction, Critical Thinking, and Social Network Analysis (SNA) in Online CoursesJoan ThormannSamuel GablePatricia Seferlis FidalgoGeorge BlakesleeThis study tried to ascertain a possible relationship between the number of student moderators (1, 2, and 3), online interactions, and critical thinking of K-12 educators enrolled in an online course that was taught from a constructivist approach. The course topic was use of technology in special education. Social network analysis (SNA) and measures of critical thinking (Newman, Webb, & Cochrane, 1995) were used to research and assess if there was a difference in interaction and critical thinking between 1, 2, or 3 student moderators who facilitated a forum discussion of an assignment in an online course. The same course was repeated over three years. Each year either 1, 2, or 3 students moderated. The analysis indicated more discussion per non-moderating student with the three student moderated group. Using SNA we found that there was only one noticeable difference among the three groups which was in the value of network centralization. Using critical thinking measures the three student moderator group scored higher in five of the eight critical thinking categories. Variations in instructor presence in the online courses may have influenced these findings. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1306/2537Constructivismcritical thinkingdistance educationonline learningpeer facilitatorssocial network analysisstudent moderatorsteacher education
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joan Thormann
Samuel Gable
Patricia Seferlis Fidalgo
George Blakeslee
spellingShingle Joan Thormann
Samuel Gable
Patricia Seferlis Fidalgo
George Blakeslee
Interaction, Critical Thinking, and Social Network Analysis (SNA) in Online Courses
International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
Constructivism
critical thinking
distance education
online learning
peer facilitators
social network analysis
student moderators
teacher education
author_facet Joan Thormann
Samuel Gable
Patricia Seferlis Fidalgo
George Blakeslee
author_sort Joan Thormann
title Interaction, Critical Thinking, and Social Network Analysis (SNA) in Online Courses
title_short Interaction, Critical Thinking, and Social Network Analysis (SNA) in Online Courses
title_full Interaction, Critical Thinking, and Social Network Analysis (SNA) in Online Courses
title_fullStr Interaction, Critical Thinking, and Social Network Analysis (SNA) in Online Courses
title_full_unstemmed Interaction, Critical Thinking, and Social Network Analysis (SNA) in Online Courses
title_sort interaction, critical thinking, and social network analysis (sna) in online courses
publisher Athabasca University Press
series International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
issn 1492-3831
publishDate 2013-07-01
description This study tried to ascertain a possible relationship between the number of student moderators (1, 2, and 3), online interactions, and critical thinking of K-12 educators enrolled in an online course that was taught from a constructivist approach. The course topic was use of technology in special education. Social network analysis (SNA) and measures of critical thinking (Newman, Webb, & Cochrane, 1995) were used to research and assess if there was a difference in interaction and critical thinking between 1, 2, or 3 student moderators who facilitated a forum discussion of an assignment in an online course. The same course was repeated over three years. Each year either 1, 2, or 3 students moderated. The analysis indicated more discussion per non-moderating student with the three student moderated group. Using SNA we found that there was only one noticeable difference among the three groups which was in the value of network centralization. Using critical thinking measures the three student moderator group scored higher in five of the eight critical thinking categories. Variations in instructor presence in the online courses may have influenced these findings.
topic Constructivism
critical thinking
distance education
online learning
peer facilitators
social network analysis
student moderators
teacher education
url http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1306/2537
work_keys_str_mv AT joanthormann interactioncriticalthinkingandsocialnetworkanalysissnainonlinecourses
AT samuelgable interactioncriticalthinkingandsocialnetworkanalysissnainonlinecourses
AT patriciaseferlisfidalgo interactioncriticalthinkingandsocialnetworkanalysissnainonlinecourses
AT georgeblakeslee interactioncriticalthinkingandsocialnetworkanalysissnainonlinecourses
_version_ 1715728810343661568