Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing

Abstract Background Our aim is to highlight the benefits and limitations of open and non-anonymized peer review. Our argument is based on the literature and on responses to a survey on the reviewing process of alt.chi, a more or less open review track within the so-called Computer Human Interaction...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lonni Besançon, Niklas Rönnberg, Jonas Löwgren, Jonathan P. Tennant, Matthew Cooper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:Research Integrity and Peer Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-020-00094-z