Practices of Professional Learning Communities

Building professional learning communities (PLC) has become a widely recognized strategy for school development and for student achievement. Four Finnish comprehensive schools were identified as being ready to be PLCs in a previous quantitative study, and the purpose of this study was to investigate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Markku Antinluoma, Liisa Ilomäki, Auli Toom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.617613/full
id doaj-278881d013414d82b3f597d8510ec61a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-278881d013414d82b3f597d8510ec61a2021-04-27T07:55:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2021-04-01610.3389/feduc.2021.617613617613Practices of Professional Learning CommunitiesMarkku Antinluoma0Liisa Ilomäki1Auli Toom2The Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandThe Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandCentre for University Teaching and Learning, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandBuilding professional learning communities (PLC) has become a widely recognized strategy for school development and for student achievement. Four Finnish comprehensive schools were identified as being ready to be PLCs in a previous quantitative study, and the purpose of this study was to investigate practices of PLCs in these schools. In this paper, we used data from qualitative multiple-case study, which investigated practices of leadership, culture, teacher collaboration, professional learning, and development. The results showed that the principals had played the main role in the progression of schools as PLCs. Principals were described as visionary leaders who had started positive progression, shared the leadership, and created commitment to common goals. The results indicated also that a change of leaders can have a positive effect. Decision-making processes were participative, inclusive, democratic, and collaborative, aiming for a satisfactory level of consensus. Relationships among staff were reported as being based on mutual trust and openness, and members were encouraged to express their opinions. Common responsibility of students, peer support, encouragement, and co-teaching were practiced. Co-teaching practices were identified as an effective form of collaborative work-embedded professional learning which is related to the core principles of professional learning communities. Structural conditions were reported as barriers to schools’ development as PLCs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.617613/fullprofessional learning communitydistributed leadershipshared leadershipprofessional learning and developmentschool culture and climateinstructional leadership
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Markku Antinluoma
Liisa Ilomäki
Auli Toom
spellingShingle Markku Antinluoma
Liisa Ilomäki
Auli Toom
Practices of Professional Learning Communities
Frontiers in Education
professional learning community
distributed leadership
shared leadership
professional learning and development
school culture and climate
instructional leadership
author_facet Markku Antinluoma
Liisa Ilomäki
Auli Toom
author_sort Markku Antinluoma
title Practices of Professional Learning Communities
title_short Practices of Professional Learning Communities
title_full Practices of Professional Learning Communities
title_fullStr Practices of Professional Learning Communities
title_full_unstemmed Practices of Professional Learning Communities
title_sort practices of professional learning communities
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Education
issn 2504-284X
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Building professional learning communities (PLC) has become a widely recognized strategy for school development and for student achievement. Four Finnish comprehensive schools were identified as being ready to be PLCs in a previous quantitative study, and the purpose of this study was to investigate practices of PLCs in these schools. In this paper, we used data from qualitative multiple-case study, which investigated practices of leadership, culture, teacher collaboration, professional learning, and development. The results showed that the principals had played the main role in the progression of schools as PLCs. Principals were described as visionary leaders who had started positive progression, shared the leadership, and created commitment to common goals. The results indicated also that a change of leaders can have a positive effect. Decision-making processes were participative, inclusive, democratic, and collaborative, aiming for a satisfactory level of consensus. Relationships among staff were reported as being based on mutual trust and openness, and members were encouraged to express their opinions. Common responsibility of students, peer support, encouragement, and co-teaching were practiced. Co-teaching practices were identified as an effective form of collaborative work-embedded professional learning which is related to the core principles of professional learning communities. Structural conditions were reported as barriers to schools’ development as PLCs.
topic professional learning community
distributed leadership
shared leadership
professional learning and development
school culture and climate
instructional leadership
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.617613/full
work_keys_str_mv AT markkuantinluoma practicesofprofessionallearningcommunities
AT liisailomaki practicesofprofessionallearningcommunities
AT aulitoom practicesofprofessionallearningcommunities
_version_ 1721505987477635072