REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI

Abstract: This essay is intended to critically reinterpret Basthomi's interpretation of his students' evaluative comments upon his teaching performance. Basthomi's argument that the students of Speak­ing I have misunderstood his typical question implicitly reveals his unreadiness to t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miftahul Huda
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: Universitas Negeri Malang 2016-02-01
Series:Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/2531
id doaj-260d5c8cbd7f4e568711c59ac6da66cd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-260d5c8cbd7f4e568711c59ac6da66cd2020-11-24T23:17:52ZindUniversitas Negeri MalangJurnal Ilmu Pendidikan0215-96432442-86552016-02-0115310.17977/jip.v15i3.25312286REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMIMiftahul HudaAbstract: This essay is intended to critically reinterpret Basthomi's interpretation of his students' evaluative comments upon his teaching performance. Basthomi's argument that the students of Speak­ing I have misunderstood his typical question implicitly reveals his unreadiness to treat a textualized ut­terance in the sphere of speaker-listener communication, suggesting that the meaning of his utterance is merely what he means by it. This article is built on a premise that the students' interpretation resulted from their compre­hensive understanding of the said, i.e. the lecturer's utterance, and the unsaid, which might be construed from his unspoken daily performance in the classroom. This notion also strengthens the presence of in­tertextuality process in the students' comments since the comments resulted from their previous "reading" of a large number of different "texts", both spoken (the said) and unspoken (the unsaid), provided by the lecturer. With this in mind, there is no reason to view the students' evaluative feedback as indeter­minate and tentative; rather, it should be seriously taken into account since their feedback might help him, and any lecturer in general, to improve his future teaching performance.http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/2531teaching performanceevaluative commentthe unsaidthe saidintertextualitytentativenessindeterminacy
collection DOAJ
language Indonesian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Miftahul Huda
spellingShingle Miftahul Huda
REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
teaching performance
evaluative comment
the unsaid
the said
intertextuality
tentativeness
indeterminacy
author_facet Miftahul Huda
author_sort Miftahul Huda
title REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI
title_short REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI
title_full REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI
title_fullStr REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI
title_full_unstemmed REINTERPRETING STUDENTS’ EVALUATIVE COMMENTS: A REPLY TO BASTHOMI
title_sort reinterpreting students’ evaluative comments: a reply to basthomi
publisher Universitas Negeri Malang
series Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
issn 0215-9643
2442-8655
publishDate 2016-02-01
description Abstract: This essay is intended to critically reinterpret Basthomi's interpretation of his students' evaluative comments upon his teaching performance. Basthomi's argument that the students of Speak­ing I have misunderstood his typical question implicitly reveals his unreadiness to treat a textualized ut­terance in the sphere of speaker-listener communication, suggesting that the meaning of his utterance is merely what he means by it. This article is built on a premise that the students' interpretation resulted from their compre­hensive understanding of the said, i.e. the lecturer's utterance, and the unsaid, which might be construed from his unspoken daily performance in the classroom. This notion also strengthens the presence of in­tertextuality process in the students' comments since the comments resulted from their previous "reading" of a large number of different "texts", both spoken (the said) and unspoken (the unsaid), provided by the lecturer. With this in mind, there is no reason to view the students' evaluative feedback as indeter­minate and tentative; rather, it should be seriously taken into account since their feedback might help him, and any lecturer in general, to improve his future teaching performance.
topic teaching performance
evaluative comment
the unsaid
the said
intertextuality
tentativeness
indeterminacy
url http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/2531
work_keys_str_mv AT miftahulhuda reinterpretingstudentsevaluativecommentsareplytobasthomi
_version_ 1725582930349129728