The constructions of early childhood practitioners’ literacy needs on an in-service Bachelor of Education course

Background: Academic literacy(ies) is a major determining qualifier for success in a university qualification. Academic literacy(ies), in this study, are seen as social practices or discourses that occur within specific academic disciplines. Students therefore needed to ‘learn’ the academic literacy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karin Hackmack
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2019-08-01
Series:South African Journal of Childhood Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sajce.co.za/index.php/sajce/article/view/582
id doaj-22a6718d4a764495afbccc36059cce2d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22a6718d4a764495afbccc36059cce2d2021-02-02T03:22:54ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Childhood Education2223-76742223-76822019-08-0191e1e1010.4102/sajce.v9i1.582334The constructions of early childhood practitioners’ literacy needs on an in-service Bachelor of Education courseKarin Hackmack0Faculty of Education, Fort Hare University, East London CampusBackground: Academic literacy(ies) is a major determining qualifier for success in a university qualification. Academic literacy(ies), in this study, are seen as social practices or discourses that occur within specific academic disciplines. Students therefore needed to ‘learn’ the academic literacy(ies) discourse of the faculty. Aim: This study investigated the way lecturers and the course facilitators understood literacies and their students’ literacy demands. Setting: The early childhood practitioners were attempting to obtain a B.Ed degree on a piloted degree career path at a university. Methods: Data were collected from individual and focus group interviews, one assessment task, and one assessment report from each respective course. Two lecturers and two course facilitators participated in the individual interviews, and three lecturers and three course facilitators participated in the focus group interviews. Results: The study revealed that the course facilitators’ and lecturers’ understanding of literacies was not cognisant of literacy as a set of social practices, nor of the enormous changes students needed to make at the level of identity to progress in their academic careers. Conclusion: The findings from the study showed a disjuncture between the understanding of the meaning of academic literacies by course facilitators and lecturers. A focused and cohesive discussion on academic literacy needs to occur in order to facilitator the practitioners’ progress.https://sajce.co.za/index.php/sajce/article/view/582academic literaciesdiscoursesearly childhoodpractitionersideological model of literacyautonomous model of literacy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karin Hackmack
spellingShingle Karin Hackmack
The constructions of early childhood practitioners’ literacy needs on an in-service Bachelor of Education course
South African Journal of Childhood Education
academic literacies
discourses
early childhood
practitioners
ideological model of literacy
autonomous model of literacy
author_facet Karin Hackmack
author_sort Karin Hackmack
title The constructions of early childhood practitioners’ literacy needs on an in-service Bachelor of Education course
title_short The constructions of early childhood practitioners’ literacy needs on an in-service Bachelor of Education course
title_full The constructions of early childhood practitioners’ literacy needs on an in-service Bachelor of Education course
title_fullStr The constructions of early childhood practitioners’ literacy needs on an in-service Bachelor of Education course
title_full_unstemmed The constructions of early childhood practitioners’ literacy needs on an in-service Bachelor of Education course
title_sort constructions of early childhood practitioners’ literacy needs on an in-service bachelor of education course
publisher AOSIS
series South African Journal of Childhood Education
issn 2223-7674
2223-7682
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Background: Academic literacy(ies) is a major determining qualifier for success in a university qualification. Academic literacy(ies), in this study, are seen as social practices or discourses that occur within specific academic disciplines. Students therefore needed to ‘learn’ the academic literacy(ies) discourse of the faculty. Aim: This study investigated the way lecturers and the course facilitators understood literacies and their students’ literacy demands. Setting: The early childhood practitioners were attempting to obtain a B.Ed degree on a piloted degree career path at a university. Methods: Data were collected from individual and focus group interviews, one assessment task, and one assessment report from each respective course. Two lecturers and two course facilitators participated in the individual interviews, and three lecturers and three course facilitators participated in the focus group interviews. Results: The study revealed that the course facilitators’ and lecturers’ understanding of literacies was not cognisant of literacy as a set of social practices, nor of the enormous changes students needed to make at the level of identity to progress in their academic careers. Conclusion: The findings from the study showed a disjuncture between the understanding of the meaning of academic literacies by course facilitators and lecturers. A focused and cohesive discussion on academic literacy needs to occur in order to facilitator the practitioners’ progress.
topic academic literacies
discourses
early childhood
practitioners
ideological model of literacy
autonomous model of literacy
url https://sajce.co.za/index.php/sajce/article/view/582
work_keys_str_mv AT karinhackmack theconstructionsofearlychildhoodpractitionersliteracyneedsonaninservicebachelorofeducationcourse
AT karinhackmack constructionsofearlychildhoodpractitionersliteracyneedsonaninservicebachelorofeducationcourse
_version_ 1724307865807618048