Analysis of Japanese Municipalities With Geopark, MAB, and GIAHS Certification

We analyzed the discussions of Japanese municipalities in their process for obtaining certifications for the Geoparks by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the Man and the Biosphere Programme (MAB) by the UNESCO, and the Globally Important Agricultural Her...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryo Kohsaka, Hikaru Matsuoka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-11-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015617517
id doaj-1ceb0f13c49448ea8bba8d8450a885fd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ceb0f13c49448ea8bba8d8450a885fd2020-11-25T03:26:03ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402015-11-01510.1177/215824401561751710.1177_2158244015617517Analysis of Japanese Municipalities With Geopark, MAB, and GIAHS CertificationRyo Kohsaka0Hikaru Matsuoka1Graduate School of Human and Socio-Environmental Studies, Kanazawa University, JapanInstitute of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa UniversityWe analyzed the discussions of Japanese municipalities in their process for obtaining certifications for the Geoparks by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the Man and the Biosphere Programme (MAB) by the UNESCO, and the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage systems (GIAHS) by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. The official records at the municipality diet were analyzed in a quantitative manner from 2011 to 2013. As the first step, we analyzed the eight municipalities of Noto and Sado for the GIAHS, the cities Itoigawa and Hakusan for the Geopark, and Katsuyama Yamanouchi village from Nagano for the MAB. As individual examples, we analyzed City of Suzu with GIAHS, Itoigawa (Geopark), and Yamanouchi town (MAB) with the text-mining approach. For the GIAHS, it was clear that the larger municipalities with city status tended to discuss certification issues more frequently than the smaller towns and villages. Terms such as conservation and certification tended to be used with GIAHS at the Suzu City. The term brand was used with GIAHS and MAB but not for the Geopark. The findings using quantitative methods are at initial stage for analysis of municipality strategies and require further future research.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015617517
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ryo Kohsaka
Hikaru Matsuoka
spellingShingle Ryo Kohsaka
Hikaru Matsuoka
Analysis of Japanese Municipalities With Geopark, MAB, and GIAHS Certification
SAGE Open
author_facet Ryo Kohsaka
Hikaru Matsuoka
author_sort Ryo Kohsaka
title Analysis of Japanese Municipalities With Geopark, MAB, and GIAHS Certification
title_short Analysis of Japanese Municipalities With Geopark, MAB, and GIAHS Certification
title_full Analysis of Japanese Municipalities With Geopark, MAB, and GIAHS Certification
title_fullStr Analysis of Japanese Municipalities With Geopark, MAB, and GIAHS Certification
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Japanese Municipalities With Geopark, MAB, and GIAHS Certification
title_sort analysis of japanese municipalities with geopark, mab, and giahs certification
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2015-11-01
description We analyzed the discussions of Japanese municipalities in their process for obtaining certifications for the Geoparks by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the Man and the Biosphere Programme (MAB) by the UNESCO, and the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage systems (GIAHS) by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. The official records at the municipality diet were analyzed in a quantitative manner from 2011 to 2013. As the first step, we analyzed the eight municipalities of Noto and Sado for the GIAHS, the cities Itoigawa and Hakusan for the Geopark, and Katsuyama Yamanouchi village from Nagano for the MAB. As individual examples, we analyzed City of Suzu with GIAHS, Itoigawa (Geopark), and Yamanouchi town (MAB) with the text-mining approach. For the GIAHS, it was clear that the larger municipalities with city status tended to discuss certification issues more frequently than the smaller towns and villages. Terms such as conservation and certification tended to be used with GIAHS at the Suzu City. The term brand was used with GIAHS and MAB but not for the Geopark. The findings using quantitative methods are at initial stage for analysis of municipality strategies and require further future research.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015617517
work_keys_str_mv AT ryokohsaka analysisofjapanesemunicipalitieswithgeoparkmabandgiahscertification
AT hikarumatsuoka analysisofjapanesemunicipalitieswithgeoparkmabandgiahscertification
_version_ 1724594182695157760