Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model for Continuous Quality Improvement of an Established Simulated Patient Program

Objective: To describe the use of a continuous quality improvement process for strengthening our simulated patient (SP) program and the initial steps that have been implemented.  Innovation: A workgroup that included five clinical faculty with significant experience working with SPs and a strong...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah. E. Vordenberg, Michael A. Smith, Heidi L. Diez, Tami L. Remington, Jolene R. Bostwick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2018-08-01
Series:INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/989
id doaj-1b0875c32bac4a6eb1e669998cad03ff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b0875c32bac4a6eb1e669998cad03ff2020-11-25T03:24:57ZengUniversity of Minnesota Libraries PublishingINNOVATIONS in Pharmacy2155-04172018-08-019210.24926/iip.v9i2.989Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model for Continuous Quality Improvement of an Established Simulated Patient ProgramSarah. E. Vordenberg0Michael A. Smith1Heidi L. Diez2Tami L. Remington3Jolene R. Bostwick4University of Michigan College of PharmacyUniversity of Michigan College of PharmacyUniversity of Michigan College of PharmacyUniversity of Michigan College of PharmacyUniversity of Michigan College of Pharmacy Objective: To describe the use of a continuous quality improvement process for strengthening our simulated patient (SP) program and the initial steps that have been implemented.  Innovation: A workgroup that included five clinical faculty with significant experience working with SPs and a strong interest in improving the SP program was developed.  The Plan-Do-Study-Act model was used as it allowed for incremental quality improvement changes, in order to ensure a high-quality SP program designed to optimize student learning.  Data were gathered from students, SPs, and faculty. Opportunities for improvement were prioritized based on anticipated benefits and available resources.  Changes related to planning, implementation, and evaluation and feedback have been executed. Critical Analysis: Changes related to planning that were implemented included developing handbooks for SPs, faculty, and graduate student instructors, as well as material for students in order to better describe the program.  SPs are now referred to as “simulated” as opposed to “standardized” as part of a broader effort to clarify the purpose of SP interactions to students.  Streamlined rubrics have been piloted, including electronic rubrics for first year students.  SPs are being trained on fewer cases, in order to improve the training program.  When possible, activities now take place in one large classroom instead of many small classrooms to improve oversight.  Finally, additional feedback has been obtained from SPs via a retreat.  These changes have been well received by students, SPs, and faculty.    Next Steps: The collection of this data and initial quality improvement changes provided a basis for hiring a full-time employee who will: dedicate 50% of their time to programmatic assessment of the SP program, support faculty with logistics and training, and be the face of our program to the students and SPs. Further, formal quantitative and qualitative assessment of the SP program has begun.   Type:  Note https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/989standardized patientsimulated patientquality improvementpharmacy education
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah. E. Vordenberg
Michael A. Smith
Heidi L. Diez
Tami L. Remington
Jolene R. Bostwick
spellingShingle Sarah. E. Vordenberg
Michael A. Smith
Heidi L. Diez
Tami L. Remington
Jolene R. Bostwick
Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model for Continuous Quality Improvement of an Established Simulated Patient Program
INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
standardized patient
simulated patient
quality improvement
pharmacy education
author_facet Sarah. E. Vordenberg
Michael A. Smith
Heidi L. Diez
Tami L. Remington
Jolene R. Bostwick
author_sort Sarah. E. Vordenberg
title Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model for Continuous Quality Improvement of an Established Simulated Patient Program
title_short Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model for Continuous Quality Improvement of an Established Simulated Patient Program
title_full Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model for Continuous Quality Improvement of an Established Simulated Patient Program
title_fullStr Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model for Continuous Quality Improvement of an Established Simulated Patient Program
title_full_unstemmed Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model for Continuous Quality Improvement of an Established Simulated Patient Program
title_sort using the plan-do-study-act (pdsa) model for continuous quality improvement of an established simulated patient program
publisher University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
series INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
issn 2155-0417
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Objective: To describe the use of a continuous quality improvement process for strengthening our simulated patient (SP) program and the initial steps that have been implemented.  Innovation: A workgroup that included five clinical faculty with significant experience working with SPs and a strong interest in improving the SP program was developed.  The Plan-Do-Study-Act model was used as it allowed for incremental quality improvement changes, in order to ensure a high-quality SP program designed to optimize student learning.  Data were gathered from students, SPs, and faculty. Opportunities for improvement were prioritized based on anticipated benefits and available resources.  Changes related to planning, implementation, and evaluation and feedback have been executed. Critical Analysis: Changes related to planning that were implemented included developing handbooks for SPs, faculty, and graduate student instructors, as well as material for students in order to better describe the program.  SPs are now referred to as “simulated” as opposed to “standardized” as part of a broader effort to clarify the purpose of SP interactions to students.  Streamlined rubrics have been piloted, including electronic rubrics for first year students.  SPs are being trained on fewer cases, in order to improve the training program.  When possible, activities now take place in one large classroom instead of many small classrooms to improve oversight.  Finally, additional feedback has been obtained from SPs via a retreat.  These changes have been well received by students, SPs, and faculty.    Next Steps: The collection of this data and initial quality improvement changes provided a basis for hiring a full-time employee who will: dedicate 50% of their time to programmatic assessment of the SP program, support faculty with logistics and training, and be the face of our program to the students and SPs. Further, formal quantitative and qualitative assessment of the SP program has begun.   Type:  Note
topic standardized patient
simulated patient
quality improvement
pharmacy education
url https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/989
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahevordenberg usingtheplandostudyactpdsamodelforcontinuousqualityimprovementofanestablishedsimulatedpatientprogram
AT michaelasmith usingtheplandostudyactpdsamodelforcontinuousqualityimprovementofanestablishedsimulatedpatientprogram
AT heidildiez usingtheplandostudyactpdsamodelforcontinuousqualityimprovementofanestablishedsimulatedpatientprogram
AT tamilremington usingtheplandostudyactpdsamodelforcontinuousqualityimprovementofanestablishedsimulatedpatientprogram
AT jolenerbostwick usingtheplandostudyactpdsamodelforcontinuousqualityimprovementofanestablishedsimulatedpatientprogram
_version_ 1724598862829584384