Explicating practice norms and tensions between values in resident training in family medicine

Abstract Background Residency programs have the intricate and complex role of training health care providers. But little is known about what residents and attendings consider norms of practice or the tensions among different values residents are expected to uphold. Thus, dialogical and reflective fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Morhaf Al Achkar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-08-01
Series:BMC Family Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-020-01242-6
id doaj-1abc5c9d55da45dc8f0125545d03b712
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1abc5c9d55da45dc8f0125545d03b7122020-11-25T03:47:13ZengBMCBMC Family Practice1471-22962020-08-012111710.1186/s12875-020-01242-6Explicating practice norms and tensions between values in resident training in family medicineMorhaf Al Achkar0Department of Family Medicine, University of WashingtonAbstract Background Residency programs have the intricate and complex role of training health care providers. But little is known about what residents and attendings consider norms of practice or the tensions among different values residents are expected to uphold. Thus, dialogical and reflective frameworks are being explored for resident learning. Methods This study examined the use of facilitated conversations with groups of residents and attending physicians while reviewing video-recorded resident–patient interactions. The conversations were recorded, transcribed, and qualitatively analyzed. Results A total of 24 residents and 10 attendings participated in conversations while separately and in parallel groups reviewing 15 resident sessions. Residents explicated the norms of practice and evaluated their performance, which often agreed with those of attending physicians in calling out important learning opportunities. When disagreement occurred, residents’ explications of their reasoning were often relevant and, via reflection and dialogue, helped clarify intentions that were not apparent in the videos. Residents and attendings often judged actions on more than one domain of value. For instance, if a resident addressed problems, built relationships in a timely manner, and acted autonomously without jeopardizing the quality of care, she satisfactorily performed her duty. Conclusions Practice norms and value struggles were addressed by participants during reviews, which provided a promising framework for learning and assessment. Also, the non-hierarchical structure opened space to acknowledge a diversity of positions and for tensions among values to be explicated.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-020-01242-6Reflective practiceVideo-reviewsPeer-learningResident education
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Morhaf Al Achkar
spellingShingle Morhaf Al Achkar
Explicating practice norms and tensions between values in resident training in family medicine
BMC Family Practice
Reflective practice
Video-reviews
Peer-learning
Resident education
author_facet Morhaf Al Achkar
author_sort Morhaf Al Achkar
title Explicating practice norms and tensions between values in resident training in family medicine
title_short Explicating practice norms and tensions between values in resident training in family medicine
title_full Explicating practice norms and tensions between values in resident training in family medicine
title_fullStr Explicating practice norms and tensions between values in resident training in family medicine
title_full_unstemmed Explicating practice norms and tensions between values in resident training in family medicine
title_sort explicating practice norms and tensions between values in resident training in family medicine
publisher BMC
series BMC Family Practice
issn 1471-2296
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract Background Residency programs have the intricate and complex role of training health care providers. But little is known about what residents and attendings consider norms of practice or the tensions among different values residents are expected to uphold. Thus, dialogical and reflective frameworks are being explored for resident learning. Methods This study examined the use of facilitated conversations with groups of residents and attending physicians while reviewing video-recorded resident–patient interactions. The conversations were recorded, transcribed, and qualitatively analyzed. Results A total of 24 residents and 10 attendings participated in conversations while separately and in parallel groups reviewing 15 resident sessions. Residents explicated the norms of practice and evaluated their performance, which often agreed with those of attending physicians in calling out important learning opportunities. When disagreement occurred, residents’ explications of their reasoning were often relevant and, via reflection and dialogue, helped clarify intentions that were not apparent in the videos. Residents and attendings often judged actions on more than one domain of value. For instance, if a resident addressed problems, built relationships in a timely manner, and acted autonomously without jeopardizing the quality of care, she satisfactorily performed her duty. Conclusions Practice norms and value struggles were addressed by participants during reviews, which provided a promising framework for learning and assessment. Also, the non-hierarchical structure opened space to acknowledge a diversity of positions and for tensions among values to be explicated.
topic Reflective practice
Video-reviews
Peer-learning
Resident education
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-020-01242-6
work_keys_str_mv AT morhafalachkar explicatingpracticenormsandtensionsbetweenvaluesinresidenttraininginfamilymedicine
_version_ 1724502855652474880