State of the Field: Differentiating Intellectual Disability From Autism Spectrum Disorder

The topic of this special issue on secondary versus idiopathic autism allows for discussion of how different groups may come to manifest autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or ASD-like symptoms despite important etiological differences. A related issue is that, because many of the social communication de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Audrey Thurm, Cristan Farmer, Emma Salzman, Catherine Lord, Somer Bishop
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00526/full
id doaj-1a971e4b4fe743d49fb3464abc66d532
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a971e4b4fe743d49fb3464abc66d5322020-11-24T23:53:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402019-07-011010.3389/fpsyt.2019.00526463398State of the Field: Differentiating Intellectual Disability From Autism Spectrum DisorderAudrey Thurm0Cristan Farmer1Emma Salzman2Catherine Lord3Somer Bishop4Neurodevelopmental and Behavioral Phenotyping Service, Office of the Clinical Director, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United StatesNeurodevelopmental and Behavioral Phenotyping Service, Office of the Clinical Director, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United StatesUCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesSemel Institute of Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesUCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesThe topic of this special issue on secondary versus idiopathic autism allows for discussion of how different groups may come to manifest autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or ASD-like symptoms despite important etiological differences. A related issue is that, because many of the social communication deficits that define ASD represent a failure to acquire developmentally expected skills, these same deficits would be expected to occur to some extent in all individuals with intellectual disability (ID). Thus, regardless of etiology, ASD symptoms may appear across groups of individuals with vastly different profiles of underlying deficits and strengths. In this focused review, we consider the impact of ID on the diagnosis of ASD. We discuss behavioral distinctions between ID and ASD, in light of the diagnostic criterion mandating that ASD should not be diagnosed if symptoms are accounted for by ID or general developmental delay. We review the evolution of the autism diagnosis and ASD diagnostic tools to understand how this distinction has been conceptualized previously. We then consider ways that operationalized criteria may be beneficial for making the clinical distinction between ID with and without ASD. Finally, we consider the impact of the blurred diagnostic boundaries between ID and ASD on the study of secondary versus idiopathic ASD. Especially pertinent to this discussion are findings that a diagnosis of ID in the context of an ASD diagnosis may be one of the strongest indicators that an associated condition or specific etiological factor is present (i.e., secondary autism).https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00526/fulldifferential diagnosisdevelopmental delayintellectual disabilityautism spectrum disorderDSM-5
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Audrey Thurm
Cristan Farmer
Emma Salzman
Catherine Lord
Somer Bishop
spellingShingle Audrey Thurm
Cristan Farmer
Emma Salzman
Catherine Lord
Somer Bishop
State of the Field: Differentiating Intellectual Disability From Autism Spectrum Disorder
Frontiers in Psychiatry
differential diagnosis
developmental delay
intellectual disability
autism spectrum disorder
DSM-5
author_facet Audrey Thurm
Cristan Farmer
Emma Salzman
Catherine Lord
Somer Bishop
author_sort Audrey Thurm
title State of the Field: Differentiating Intellectual Disability From Autism Spectrum Disorder
title_short State of the Field: Differentiating Intellectual Disability From Autism Spectrum Disorder
title_full State of the Field: Differentiating Intellectual Disability From Autism Spectrum Disorder
title_fullStr State of the Field: Differentiating Intellectual Disability From Autism Spectrum Disorder
title_full_unstemmed State of the Field: Differentiating Intellectual Disability From Autism Spectrum Disorder
title_sort state of the field: differentiating intellectual disability from autism spectrum disorder
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
issn 1664-0640
publishDate 2019-07-01
description The topic of this special issue on secondary versus idiopathic autism allows for discussion of how different groups may come to manifest autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or ASD-like symptoms despite important etiological differences. A related issue is that, because many of the social communication deficits that define ASD represent a failure to acquire developmentally expected skills, these same deficits would be expected to occur to some extent in all individuals with intellectual disability (ID). Thus, regardless of etiology, ASD symptoms may appear across groups of individuals with vastly different profiles of underlying deficits and strengths. In this focused review, we consider the impact of ID on the diagnosis of ASD. We discuss behavioral distinctions between ID and ASD, in light of the diagnostic criterion mandating that ASD should not be diagnosed if symptoms are accounted for by ID or general developmental delay. We review the evolution of the autism diagnosis and ASD diagnostic tools to understand how this distinction has been conceptualized previously. We then consider ways that operationalized criteria may be beneficial for making the clinical distinction between ID with and without ASD. Finally, we consider the impact of the blurred diagnostic boundaries between ID and ASD on the study of secondary versus idiopathic ASD. Especially pertinent to this discussion are findings that a diagnosis of ID in the context of an ASD diagnosis may be one of the strongest indicators that an associated condition or specific etiological factor is present (i.e., secondary autism).
topic differential diagnosis
developmental delay
intellectual disability
autism spectrum disorder
DSM-5
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00526/full
work_keys_str_mv AT audreythurm stateofthefielddifferentiatingintellectualdisabilityfromautismspectrumdisorder
AT cristanfarmer stateofthefielddifferentiatingintellectualdisabilityfromautismspectrumdisorder
AT emmasalzman stateofthefielddifferentiatingintellectualdisabilityfromautismspectrumdisorder
AT catherinelord stateofthefielddifferentiatingintellectualdisabilityfromautismspectrumdisorder
AT somerbishop stateofthefielddifferentiatingintellectualdisabilityfromautismspectrumdisorder
_version_ 1725469292687785984