Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
ABSTRACT This research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100705&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-1a82069236474a64b1b8e1859c9524bc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1a82069236474a64b1b8e1859c9524bc2020-11-24T23:52:10ZengSociedade Brasileira de ZootecniaRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia1806-92904810.1590/rbz4820180259S1516-35982019000100705Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?Camila Soares CunhaMarcos Inácio MarcondesAlex Lopes da SilvaTathyane Ramalho Santos GionbelliMarco Aurélio Schiavo NovaesLeonardo Sidney KnuppGercino Ferreira Virginio JúniorCristina Mattos VelosoABSTRACT This research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed in a 5×5 Latin square design, with five experimental periods of 15 days, with seven days for adaptation to the additives and the remaining days for data records and sampling. Total mixed ration (TMR) was composed by corn silage (20%) and concentrate (80%) based on corn and soybean meal. Five treatments were evaluated: without additive use (negative control; NC); chemical buffer addition – 0.71% in concentrate DM of sodium bicarbonate and 0.18% of magnesium oxide (positive control, PC); 10 g/day live yeast (LY); 15 g/day of inactive yeast (IY15); and 30 g/day of inactive yeast (IY30). Sugarcane yeasts were directly infused in rumen immediately after morning and afternoon feed supply. Feed additives did not affect voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, and sorting behavior of animals. However, heifers from all treatments presented preferential intake of fibrous fraction of diet, especially those from NC and IY15. Nitrogen balance, VFA concentrations, and blood parameters were not influenced as well. Sodium bicarbonate and magnesium oxide led to greater ruminal pH than yeast, and IY15 presented greater pH than IY30. Ruminal ammonia was increased by the use of additives. Active and inactive yeasts are not recommended as feed additives for bovines fed diets with 80% of concentrate since it allows animals to select fibrous particles from TMR, and no representative gain in ruminal parameters and digestibilities are guaranteed.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100705&lng=en&tlng=endigestibilityfeed additiveintakepHruminal ammoniavolatile fatty acids |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Camila Soares Cunha Marcos Inácio Marcondes Alex Lopes da Silva Tathyane Ramalho Santos Gionbelli Marco Aurélio Schiavo Novaes Leonardo Sidney Knupp Gercino Ferreira Virginio Júnior Cristina Mattos Veloso |
spellingShingle |
Camila Soares Cunha Marcos Inácio Marcondes Alex Lopes da Silva Tathyane Ramalho Santos Gionbelli Marco Aurélio Schiavo Novaes Leonardo Sidney Knupp Gercino Ferreira Virginio Júnior Cristina Mattos Veloso Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment? Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia digestibility feed additive intake pH ruminal ammonia volatile fatty acids |
author_facet |
Camila Soares Cunha Marcos Inácio Marcondes Alex Lopes da Silva Tathyane Ramalho Santos Gionbelli Marco Aurélio Schiavo Novaes Leonardo Sidney Knupp Gercino Ferreira Virginio Júnior Cristina Mattos Veloso |
author_sort |
Camila Soares Cunha |
title |
Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment? |
title_short |
Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment? |
title_full |
Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment? |
title_fullStr |
Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment? |
title_sort |
do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment? |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
series |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia |
issn |
1806-9290 |
description |
ABSTRACT This research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed in a 5×5 Latin square design, with five experimental periods of 15 days, with seven days for adaptation to the additives and the remaining days for data records and sampling. Total mixed ration (TMR) was composed by corn silage (20%) and concentrate (80%) based on corn and soybean meal. Five treatments were evaluated: without additive use (negative control; NC); chemical buffer addition – 0.71% in concentrate DM of sodium bicarbonate and 0.18% of magnesium oxide (positive control, PC); 10 g/day live yeast (LY); 15 g/day of inactive yeast (IY15); and 30 g/day of inactive yeast (IY30). Sugarcane yeasts were directly infused in rumen immediately after morning and afternoon feed supply. Feed additives did not affect voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, and sorting behavior of animals. However, heifers from all treatments presented preferential intake of fibrous fraction of diet, especially those from NC and IY15. Nitrogen balance, VFA concentrations, and blood parameters were not influenced as well. Sodium bicarbonate and magnesium oxide led to greater ruminal pH than yeast, and IY15 presented greater pH than IY30. Ruminal ammonia was increased by the use of additives. Active and inactive yeasts are not recommended as feed additives for bovines fed diets with 80% of concentrate since it allows animals to select fibrous particles from TMR, and no representative gain in ruminal parameters and digestibilities are guaranteed. |
topic |
digestibility feed additive intake pH ruminal ammonia volatile fatty acids |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100705&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT camilasoarescunha doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment AT marcosinaciomarcondes doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment AT alexlopesdasilva doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment AT tathyaneramalhosantosgionbelli doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment AT marcoaurelioschiavonovaes doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment AT leonardosidneyknupp doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment AT gercinoferreiravirginiojunior doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment AT cristinamattosveloso doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment |
_version_ |
1725474469084921856 |