Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?

ABSTRACT This research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Camila Soares Cunha, Marcos Inácio Marcondes, Alex Lopes da Silva, Tathyane Ramalho Santos Gionbelli, Marco Aurélio Schiavo Novaes, Leonardo Sidney Knupp, Gercino Ferreira Virginio Júnior, Cristina Mattos Veloso
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
Series:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
Subjects:
pH
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100705&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-1a82069236474a64b1b8e1859c9524bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a82069236474a64b1b8e1859c9524bc2020-11-24T23:52:10ZengSociedade Brasileira de ZootecniaRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia1806-92904810.1590/rbz4820180259S1516-35982019000100705Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?Camila Soares CunhaMarcos Inácio MarcondesAlex Lopes da SilvaTathyane Ramalho Santos GionbelliMarco Aurélio Schiavo NovaesLeonardo Sidney KnuppGercino Ferreira Virginio JúniorCristina Mattos VelosoABSTRACT This research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed in a 5×5 Latin square design, with five experimental periods of 15 days, with seven days for adaptation to the additives and the remaining days for data records and sampling. Total mixed ration (TMR) was composed by corn silage (20%) and concentrate (80%) based on corn and soybean meal. Five treatments were evaluated: without additive use (negative control; NC); chemical buffer addition – 0.71% in concentrate DM of sodium bicarbonate and 0.18% of magnesium oxide (positive control, PC); 10 g/day live yeast (LY); 15 g/day of inactive yeast (IY15); and 30 g/day of inactive yeast (IY30). Sugarcane yeasts were directly infused in rumen immediately after morning and afternoon feed supply. Feed additives did not affect voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, and sorting behavior of animals. However, heifers from all treatments presented preferential intake of fibrous fraction of diet, especially those from NC and IY15. Nitrogen balance, VFA concentrations, and blood parameters were not influenced as well. Sodium bicarbonate and magnesium oxide led to greater ruminal pH than yeast, and IY15 presented greater pH than IY30. Ruminal ammonia was increased by the use of additives. Active and inactive yeasts are not recommended as feed additives for bovines fed diets with 80% of concentrate since it allows animals to select fibrous particles from TMR, and no representative gain in ruminal parameters and digestibilities are guaranteed.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100705&lng=en&tlng=endigestibilityfeed additiveintakepHruminal ammoniavolatile fatty acids
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Camila Soares Cunha
Marcos Inácio Marcondes
Alex Lopes da Silva
Tathyane Ramalho Santos Gionbelli
Marco Aurélio Schiavo Novaes
Leonardo Sidney Knupp
Gercino Ferreira Virginio Júnior
Cristina Mattos Veloso
spellingShingle Camila Soares Cunha
Marcos Inácio Marcondes
Alex Lopes da Silva
Tathyane Ramalho Santos Gionbelli
Marco Aurélio Schiavo Novaes
Leonardo Sidney Knupp
Gercino Ferreira Virginio Júnior
Cristina Mattos Veloso
Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
digestibility
feed additive
intake
pH
ruminal ammonia
volatile fatty acids
author_facet Camila Soares Cunha
Marcos Inácio Marcondes
Alex Lopes da Silva
Tathyane Ramalho Santos Gionbelli
Marco Aurélio Schiavo Novaes
Leonardo Sidney Knupp
Gercino Ferreira Virginio Júnior
Cristina Mattos Veloso
author_sort Camila Soares Cunha
title Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title_short Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title_full Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title_fullStr Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title_full_unstemmed Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
title_sort do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
series Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
issn 1806-9290
description ABSTRACT This research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed in a 5×5 Latin square design, with five experimental periods of 15 days, with seven days for adaptation to the additives and the remaining days for data records and sampling. Total mixed ration (TMR) was composed by corn silage (20%) and concentrate (80%) based on corn and soybean meal. Five treatments were evaluated: without additive use (negative control; NC); chemical buffer addition – 0.71% in concentrate DM of sodium bicarbonate and 0.18% of magnesium oxide (positive control, PC); 10 g/day live yeast (LY); 15 g/day of inactive yeast (IY15); and 30 g/day of inactive yeast (IY30). Sugarcane yeasts were directly infused in rumen immediately after morning and afternoon feed supply. Feed additives did not affect voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, and sorting behavior of animals. However, heifers from all treatments presented preferential intake of fibrous fraction of diet, especially those from NC and IY15. Nitrogen balance, VFA concentrations, and blood parameters were not influenced as well. Sodium bicarbonate and magnesium oxide led to greater ruminal pH than yeast, and IY15 presented greater pH than IY30. Ruminal ammonia was increased by the use of additives. Active and inactive yeasts are not recommended as feed additives for bovines fed diets with 80% of concentrate since it allows animals to select fibrous particles from TMR, and no representative gain in ruminal parameters and digestibilities are guaranteed.
topic digestibility
feed additive
intake
pH
ruminal ammonia
volatile fatty acids
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982019000100705&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT camilasoarescunha doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment
AT marcosinaciomarcondes doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment
AT alexlopesdasilva doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment
AT tathyaneramalhosantosgionbelli doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment
AT marcoaurelioschiavonovaes doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment
AT leonardosidneyknupp doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment
AT gercinoferreiravirginiojunior doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment
AT cristinamattosveloso doliveorinactiveyeastsimprovecattleruminalenvironment
_version_ 1725474469084921856