Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Five Important Issues We Aren’t Discussing (But Probably Should Be)

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory device often publicized for its ability to enhance cognitive and behavioral performance. These enhancement claims, however, are predicated upon electrophysiological evidence and descriptions which are far from conclusive. In fact,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jared Cooney Horvath, Olivia eCarter, Jason D. Forte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00002/full
id doaj-17f1bbe90e0844739bc09f2ba2abe663
record_format Article
spelling doaj-17f1bbe90e0844739bc09f2ba2abe6632020-11-24T23:58:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience1662-51372014-01-01810.3389/fnsys.2014.0000279090Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Five Important Issues We Aren’t Discussing (But Probably Should Be)Jared Cooney Horvath0Olivia eCarter1Jason D. Forte2University of MelbourneUniversity of MelbourneUniversity of MelbourneTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory device often publicized for its ability to enhance cognitive and behavioral performance. These enhancement claims, however, are predicated upon electrophysiological evidence and descriptions which are far from conclusive. In fact, a review of the literature reveals a number of important experimental and technical issues inherent with this device that are simply not being discussed in any meaningful manner. <br/><br/>In this paper, we will consider five of these topics. The first, inter-subject variability, explores the extensive between- and within-group differences found within the tDCS literature and highlights the need to properly examine stimulatory response at the individual level. The second, intra-subject reliability, reviews the lack of data concerning tDCS response reliability over time and emphasizes the importance of this knowledge for appropriate stimulatory application. The third, sham stimulation and blinding, draws attention to the importance (yet relative lack) of proper control and blinding practices in the tDCS literature. The fourth, motor and cognitive interference, highlights the often overlooked body of research that suggests typical behaviors and cognitions undertaken during or following tDCS can impair or abolish the effects of stimulation. Finally, the fifth, electric current influences, underscores several largely ignored variables (such as hair thickness and electrode attachments methods) influential to tDCS electric current density and flow.<br/><br/>Through this paper, we hope to increase awareness and start an ongoing dialogue of these important issues which speak to the efficacy, reliability, and mechanistic foundations of tDCS.<br/>http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00002/fulltranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)variabilityReliabilityefficacymechanisms of action
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jared Cooney Horvath
Olivia eCarter
Jason D. Forte
spellingShingle Jared Cooney Horvath
Olivia eCarter
Jason D. Forte
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Five Important Issues We Aren’t Discussing (But Probably Should Be)
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
variability
Reliability
efficacy
mechanisms of action
author_facet Jared Cooney Horvath
Olivia eCarter
Jason D. Forte
author_sort Jared Cooney Horvath
title Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Five Important Issues We Aren’t Discussing (But Probably Should Be)
title_short Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Five Important Issues We Aren’t Discussing (But Probably Should Be)
title_full Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Five Important Issues We Aren’t Discussing (But Probably Should Be)
title_fullStr Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Five Important Issues We Aren’t Discussing (But Probably Should Be)
title_full_unstemmed Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Five Important Issues We Aren’t Discussing (But Probably Should Be)
title_sort transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren’t discussing (but probably should be)
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
issn 1662-5137
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory device often publicized for its ability to enhance cognitive and behavioral performance. These enhancement claims, however, are predicated upon electrophysiological evidence and descriptions which are far from conclusive. In fact, a review of the literature reveals a number of important experimental and technical issues inherent with this device that are simply not being discussed in any meaningful manner. <br/><br/>In this paper, we will consider five of these topics. The first, inter-subject variability, explores the extensive between- and within-group differences found within the tDCS literature and highlights the need to properly examine stimulatory response at the individual level. The second, intra-subject reliability, reviews the lack of data concerning tDCS response reliability over time and emphasizes the importance of this knowledge for appropriate stimulatory application. The third, sham stimulation and blinding, draws attention to the importance (yet relative lack) of proper control and blinding practices in the tDCS literature. The fourth, motor and cognitive interference, highlights the often overlooked body of research that suggests typical behaviors and cognitions undertaken during or following tDCS can impair or abolish the effects of stimulation. Finally, the fifth, electric current influences, underscores several largely ignored variables (such as hair thickness and electrode attachments methods) influential to tDCS electric current density and flow.<br/><br/>Through this paper, we hope to increase awareness and start an ongoing dialogue of these important issues which speak to the efficacy, reliability, and mechanistic foundations of tDCS.<br/>
topic transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
variability
Reliability
efficacy
mechanisms of action
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00002/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jaredcooneyhorvath transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationfiveimportantissueswearentdiscussingbutprobablyshouldbe
AT oliviaecarter transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationfiveimportantissueswearentdiscussingbutprobablyshouldbe
AT jasondforte transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationfiveimportantissueswearentdiscussingbutprobablyshouldbe
_version_ 1725449660798074880