Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily

The OB-fold is a diverse structure superfamily based on a β-barrel motif that is often supplemented with additional non-conserved secondary structures. Previous deletion mutagenesis and NMR hydrogen exchange studies of three OB-fold proteins showed that the structural stabilities of sites within the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrei T. Alexandrescu, Sarah R. Sheftic, Kaitlyn M. Guardino, Robert E. Slattery
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2009-05-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/10/5/2412/
id doaj-17ce0bf9fcd64956a384b9c429c63051
record_format Article
spelling doaj-17ce0bf9fcd64956a384b9c429c630512020-11-24T23:08:01ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1422-00672009-05-011052412243010.3390/ijms10052412Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold SuperfamilyAndrei T. AlexandrescuSarah R. ShefticKaitlyn M. GuardinoRobert E. SlatteryThe OB-fold is a diverse structure superfamily based on a β-barrel motif that is often supplemented with additional non-conserved secondary structures. Previous deletion mutagenesis and NMR hydrogen exchange studies of three OB-fold proteins showed that the structural stabilities of sites within the conserved β-barrels were larger than sites in non-conserved segments. In this work we examined a database of 80 representative domain structures currently classified as OB-folds, to establish the basis of this effect. Residue-specific values were obtained for the number of Cα-Cα distance contacts, sequence hydrophobicities, crystallographic B-factors, and theoretical B-factors calculated from a Gaussian Network Model. All four parameters point to a larger average flexibility for the non-conserved structures compared to the conserved β-barrels. The theoretical B-factors and contact densities show the highest sensitivity.Our results suggest a model of protein structure evolution in which novel structural features develop at the periphery of conserved motifs. Core residues are more resistant to structural changes during evolution since their substitution would disrupt a larger number of interactions. Similar factors are likely to account for the differences in stability to unfolding between conserved and non-conserved structures. http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/10/5/2412/protein foldingstructural genomicsstructure similarityprotein dynamicsmodularity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrei T. Alexandrescu
Sarah R. Sheftic
Kaitlyn M. Guardino
Robert E. Slattery
spellingShingle Andrei T. Alexandrescu
Sarah R. Sheftic
Kaitlyn M. Guardino
Robert E. Slattery
Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
protein folding
structural genomics
structure similarity
protein dynamics
modularity
author_facet Andrei T. Alexandrescu
Sarah R. Sheftic
Kaitlyn M. Guardino
Robert E. Slattery
author_sort Andrei T. Alexandrescu
title Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily
title_short Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily
title_full Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily
title_fullStr Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily
title_full_unstemmed Relative Stabilities of Conserved and Non-Conserved Structures in the OB-Fold Superfamily
title_sort relative stabilities of conserved and non-conserved structures in the ob-fold superfamily
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Molecular Sciences
issn 1422-0067
publishDate 2009-05-01
description The OB-fold is a diverse structure superfamily based on a β-barrel motif that is often supplemented with additional non-conserved secondary structures. Previous deletion mutagenesis and NMR hydrogen exchange studies of three OB-fold proteins showed that the structural stabilities of sites within the conserved β-barrels were larger than sites in non-conserved segments. In this work we examined a database of 80 representative domain structures currently classified as OB-folds, to establish the basis of this effect. Residue-specific values were obtained for the number of Cα-Cα distance contacts, sequence hydrophobicities, crystallographic B-factors, and theoretical B-factors calculated from a Gaussian Network Model. All four parameters point to a larger average flexibility for the non-conserved structures compared to the conserved β-barrels. The theoretical B-factors and contact densities show the highest sensitivity.Our results suggest a model of protein structure evolution in which novel structural features develop at the periphery of conserved motifs. Core residues are more resistant to structural changes during evolution since their substitution would disrupt a larger number of interactions. Similar factors are likely to account for the differences in stability to unfolding between conserved and non-conserved structures.
topic protein folding
structural genomics
structure similarity
protein dynamics
modularity
url http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/10/5/2412/
work_keys_str_mv AT andreitalexandrescu relativestabilitiesofconservedandnonconservedstructuresintheobfoldsuperfamily
AT sarahrsheftic relativestabilitiesofconservedandnonconservedstructuresintheobfoldsuperfamily
AT kaitlynmguardino relativestabilitiesofconservedandnonconservedstructuresintheobfoldsuperfamily
AT roberteslattery relativestabilitiesofconservedandnonconservedstructuresintheobfoldsuperfamily
_version_ 1725615842518892544