On the Orientation Error of IMU: Investigating Static and Dynamic Accuracy Targeting Human Motion.

The accuracy in orientation tracking attainable by using inertial measurement units (IMU) when measuring human motion is still an open issue. This study presents a systematic quantification of the accuracy under static conditions and typical human dynamics, simulated by means of a robotic arm. Two s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luca Ricci, Fabrizio Taffoni, Domenico Formica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5017605?pdf=render
id doaj-11e21b8d01284c889a382731931d37e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-11e21b8d01284c889a382731931d37e22020-11-25T02:36:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01119e016194010.1371/journal.pone.0161940On the Orientation Error of IMU: Investigating Static and Dynamic Accuracy Targeting Human Motion.Luca RicciFabrizio TaffoniDomenico FormicaThe accuracy in orientation tracking attainable by using inertial measurement units (IMU) when measuring human motion is still an open issue. This study presents a systematic quantification of the accuracy under static conditions and typical human dynamics, simulated by means of a robotic arm. Two sensor fusion algorithms, selected from the classes of the stochastic and complementary methods, are considered. The proposed protocol implements controlled and repeatable experimental conditions and validates accuracy for an extensive set of dynamic movements, that differ in frequency and amplitude of the movement. We found that dynamic performance of the tracking is only slightly dependent on the sensor fusion algorithm. Instead, it is dependent on the amplitude and frequency of the movement and a major contribution to the error derives from the orientation of the rotation axis w.r.t. the gravity vector. Absolute and relative errors upper bounds are found respectively in the range [0.7° ÷ 8.2°] and [1.0° ÷ 10.3°]. Alongside dynamic, static accuracy is thoroughly investigated, also with an emphasis on convergence behavior of the different algorithms. Reported results emphasize critical issues associated with the use of this technology and provide a baseline level of performance for the human motion related application.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5017605?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luca Ricci
Fabrizio Taffoni
Domenico Formica
spellingShingle Luca Ricci
Fabrizio Taffoni
Domenico Formica
On the Orientation Error of IMU: Investigating Static and Dynamic Accuracy Targeting Human Motion.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Luca Ricci
Fabrizio Taffoni
Domenico Formica
author_sort Luca Ricci
title On the Orientation Error of IMU: Investigating Static and Dynamic Accuracy Targeting Human Motion.
title_short On the Orientation Error of IMU: Investigating Static and Dynamic Accuracy Targeting Human Motion.
title_full On the Orientation Error of IMU: Investigating Static and Dynamic Accuracy Targeting Human Motion.
title_fullStr On the Orientation Error of IMU: Investigating Static and Dynamic Accuracy Targeting Human Motion.
title_full_unstemmed On the Orientation Error of IMU: Investigating Static and Dynamic Accuracy Targeting Human Motion.
title_sort on the orientation error of imu: investigating static and dynamic accuracy targeting human motion.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The accuracy in orientation tracking attainable by using inertial measurement units (IMU) when measuring human motion is still an open issue. This study presents a systematic quantification of the accuracy under static conditions and typical human dynamics, simulated by means of a robotic arm. Two sensor fusion algorithms, selected from the classes of the stochastic and complementary methods, are considered. The proposed protocol implements controlled and repeatable experimental conditions and validates accuracy for an extensive set of dynamic movements, that differ in frequency and amplitude of the movement. We found that dynamic performance of the tracking is only slightly dependent on the sensor fusion algorithm. Instead, it is dependent on the amplitude and frequency of the movement and a major contribution to the error derives from the orientation of the rotation axis w.r.t. the gravity vector. Absolute and relative errors upper bounds are found respectively in the range [0.7° ÷ 8.2°] and [1.0° ÷ 10.3°]. Alongside dynamic, static accuracy is thoroughly investigated, also with an emphasis on convergence behavior of the different algorithms. Reported results emphasize critical issues associated with the use of this technology and provide a baseline level of performance for the human motion related application.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5017605?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lucaricci ontheorientationerrorofimuinvestigatingstaticanddynamicaccuracytargetinghumanmotion
AT fabriziotaffoni ontheorientationerrorofimuinvestigatingstaticanddynamicaccuracytargetinghumanmotion
AT domenicoformica ontheorientationerrorofimuinvestigatingstaticanddynamicaccuracytargetinghumanmotion
_version_ 1724798499685400576