A Computational Model of Quantitative Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Analysis

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis is widely used to identify the locations in genomes occupied by transcription factors (TFs). The approach involves chemical cross-linking of DNA with associated proteins, fragmentation of chromatin by sonication or enzymatic digestion, immunoprecipitatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jingping Xie, Philip S. Crooke, Brett A. McKinney, Joel Soltman, Stephen J. Brandt M.D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2008-01-01
Series:Cancer Informatics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S295
id doaj-10ec3d9ea893448ab72284646a64476b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-10ec3d9ea893448ab72284646a64476b2020-11-25T03:15:36ZengSAGE PublishingCancer Informatics1176-93512008-01-01610.4137/CIN.S295A Computational Model of Quantitative Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) AnalysisJingping Xie0Philip S. Crooke1Brett A. McKinney2Joel Soltman3Stephen J. Brandt M.D.4Departments of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, U.S.A.Mathematics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, U.S.A.Department of Genetics, University of Alabama Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, U.S.A.University School of Nashville, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, U.S.A.VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, U.S.A.Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis is widely used to identify the locations in genomes occupied by transcription factors (TFs). The approach involves chemical cross-linking of DNA with associated proteins, fragmentation of chromatin by sonication or enzymatic digestion, immunoprecipitation of the fragments containing the protein of interest, and then PCR or hybridization analysis to characterize and quantify the genomic sequences enriched. We developed a computational model of quantitative ChIP analysis to elucidate the factors contributing to the method's resolution. The most important variables identified by the model were, in order of importance, the spacing of the PCR primers, the mean length of the chromatin fragments, and, unexpectedly, the type of fragment width distribution, with very small DNA fragments and smaller amplicons providing the best resolution of TF binding. One of the major predictions of the model was also validated experimentally.https://doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S295
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jingping Xie
Philip S. Crooke
Brett A. McKinney
Joel Soltman
Stephen J. Brandt M.D.
spellingShingle Jingping Xie
Philip S. Crooke
Brett A. McKinney
Joel Soltman
Stephen J. Brandt M.D.
A Computational Model of Quantitative Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Analysis
Cancer Informatics
author_facet Jingping Xie
Philip S. Crooke
Brett A. McKinney
Joel Soltman
Stephen J. Brandt M.D.
author_sort Jingping Xie
title A Computational Model of Quantitative Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Analysis
title_short A Computational Model of Quantitative Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Analysis
title_full A Computational Model of Quantitative Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Analysis
title_fullStr A Computational Model of Quantitative Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Computational Model of Quantitative Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Analysis
title_sort computational model of quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation (chip) analysis
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Cancer Informatics
issn 1176-9351
publishDate 2008-01-01
description Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis is widely used to identify the locations in genomes occupied by transcription factors (TFs). The approach involves chemical cross-linking of DNA with associated proteins, fragmentation of chromatin by sonication or enzymatic digestion, immunoprecipitation of the fragments containing the protein of interest, and then PCR or hybridization analysis to characterize and quantify the genomic sequences enriched. We developed a computational model of quantitative ChIP analysis to elucidate the factors contributing to the method's resolution. The most important variables identified by the model were, in order of importance, the spacing of the PCR primers, the mean length of the chromatin fragments, and, unexpectedly, the type of fragment width distribution, with very small DNA fragments and smaller amplicons providing the best resolution of TF binding. One of the major predictions of the model was also validated experimentally.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S295
work_keys_str_mv AT jingpingxie acomputationalmodelofquantitativechromatinimmunoprecipitationchipanalysis
AT philipscrooke acomputationalmodelofquantitativechromatinimmunoprecipitationchipanalysis
AT brettamckinney acomputationalmodelofquantitativechromatinimmunoprecipitationchipanalysis
AT joelsoltman acomputationalmodelofquantitativechromatinimmunoprecipitationchipanalysis
AT stephenjbrandtmd acomputationalmodelofquantitativechromatinimmunoprecipitationchipanalysis
AT jingpingxie computationalmodelofquantitativechromatinimmunoprecipitationchipanalysis
AT philipscrooke computationalmodelofquantitativechromatinimmunoprecipitationchipanalysis
AT brettamckinney computationalmodelofquantitativechromatinimmunoprecipitationchipanalysis
AT joelsoltman computationalmodelofquantitativechromatinimmunoprecipitationchipanalysis
AT stephenjbrandtmd computationalmodelofquantitativechromatinimmunoprecipitationchipanalysis
_version_ 1724638554653458432